TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Netlify for the frontend, Micro for the backend

144 点作者 chuhnk超过 4 年前

14 条评论

jfengel超过 4 年前
Your page doesn&#x27;t show any of the backend code being deployed. I don&#x27;t even know what language it&#x27;s in.<p>So it&#x27;s a little hard for me to compare it to Netlify, which does have backend support in the form of lambdas, and a database in the form of FaunaDB. That&#x27;s fairly limited, but it&#x27;s also very easy.<p>Clicking through to the github page, it looks like the examples are in Go... though I also see a Dockerfile. For me, I&#x27;d be more interested in having your blurb page focus more on how one writes the back end, since that&#x27;s what you&#x27;re really selling.
评论 #25070197 未加载
brabel超过 4 年前
I&#x27;ve been looking for exactly that: a backend thing that&#x27;s as easy to setup as Netlify is for the frontend.<p>Micro seems to be a Go framework evolved to automatically deploy code to the &quot;cloud&quot;, but it seems it&#x27;ll remain limited to Go backends... I can write Go without problems, but I wanted something that supports other languages as well, specially Java... I think RedHat seems to offer that with OpenShift and Quarkus[1], but their material is so ridden with marketing buzzwords I am not sure it&#x27;s suitable for what I&#x27;m looking for (basically, a small server that can store a small amount of documents or key-value information on whatever database the platform supports without fuss).<p>Heroku seems to be the most close to this I could find, but it&#x27;s pretty expensive from what I saw if you need a DB.<p>Does anyone have suggestions for alternatives?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.redhat.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2020&#x2F;05&#x2F;28&#x2F;quarkus-a-kubernetes-native-java-runtime-now-fully-supported-by-red-hat&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.redhat.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2020&#x2F;05&#x2F;28&#x2F;quarkus-a-kube...</a>
评论 #25073831 未加载
评论 #25069290 未加载
评论 #25075615 未加载
评论 #25072462 未加载
评论 #25071339 未加载
评论 #25073814 未加载
评论 #25075690 未加载
评论 #25087701 未加载
hans0l074超过 4 年前
When I read about such abstractions and &quot;simplifications&quot; (which usually end up with a 10 box diagram simplified to a 2-3 box diagram), I often hesitate to start building something new, always wondering &quot;Am I doing this in the most &quot;&lt;tech_forum&gt; upvoted&quot; way of implementing such a thing? Some of this tech feels like if you switch on, and stare at your monitor long enough, a &quot;Hello World&quot; API will be deployed on the cloud for you, voilà!
评论 #25069544 未加载
评论 #25069051 未加载
评论 #25073343 未加载
simoneau超过 4 年前
Make sure you&#x27;re cool with micro&#x27;s license: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;polyformproject.org&#x2F;licenses&#x2F;shield&#x2F;1.0.0&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;polyformproject.org&#x2F;licenses&#x2F;shield&#x2F;1.0.0&#x2F;</a> The noncompete clause is problematic.
评论 #25071490 未加载
评论 #25074580 未加载
评论 #25074437 未加载
clafferty超过 4 年前
Bravo m3o, this looks awesome!<p>Netlifys approach to static sites seemed like a no brainer since HTML is easy to host. They added lots of sugar around that to make it effortless and easy. So M3o seems like a great idea.<p>Micro on the other hand will need some buy in but I&#x27;ll definitely consider it since we use Go already.<p>One concern is your pricing seems too reasonable (free)!
评论 #25070114 未加载
评论 #25069833 未加载
rishav_sharan超过 4 年前
What about the database? All these Jamstack articles always seem to skip past a db in their examples and I have never seen an &quot;app&quot; without an associated database.<p>Or is the KV store supposed to act like an app database?
评论 #25069672 未加载
评论 #25070917 未加载
评论 #25070051 未加载
评论 #25069348 未加载
wetpaws超过 4 年前
Yow dawg, you fleed to netlify to avoid insane over-engineered technology stacks, so we brought you insane over-engineered technology stack with protobuffs and gRPC
评论 #25072494 未加载
asim超过 4 年前
Hi HN! Asim here. Founder CEO of Micro. We&#x27;ve been working on M3O for some time now and excited to not only share it with the world but help understand our positioning amongst other technology such as Netlify and the frontend. Happy to answer any questions.
评论 #25069403 未加载
afterwalk超过 4 年前
The value proposition was clear and well written, until I got to this part:<p>&quot;you want to do it without having to standup layers of infrastructure on AWS or be beholden to the legacy players like Heroku or other providers who don’t get that you want the same Netlify like experience on the backend.&quot;<p>So exactly how is Heroku &quot;legacy&quot;? From past experiences pushing a simple backend service onto Heroku was pretty smooth and &quot;Netlify-esq&quot;.<p>It would be nice to explain or show the shortcomings of using Heroku as the backend for your Netlify app.
评论 #25076531 未加载
评论 #25077285 未加载
LogicX超过 4 年前
Biggest thing for me is netlify’s distributed nature. I don’t see anything about m3o being in multiple data centers the way fly.io is. For me, that better aligns with an appropriate backend for Netlify. (Or cloudflare workers)
评论 #25070564 未加载
asim超过 4 年前
For anyone else who finds this and wants to know more about the internals of Micro itself. Here&#x27;s the announcement post for Micro 3.0 aka M3O.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;micro.mu&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2020&#x2F;11&#x2F;05&#x2F;micro-v3-aka-m3o.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;micro.mu&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2020&#x2F;11&#x2F;05&#x2F;micro-v3-aka-m3o.html</a>
BenGosub超过 4 年前
Microservices have to be written in Go Nitro framework, this is not framework&#x2F;language agnostic?
评论 #25071524 未加载
sebringj超过 4 年前
Netlify also has lambdas and coupled with firebase or faunadb, its pretty good.
agambrahma超过 4 年前
Interesting but perplexing: is this sort of an alternative to Darklang?