TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How you do QA is probably terrible

2 点作者 Ramone超过 4 年前

1 comment

detaro超过 4 年前
The &quot;Mitigating Measures&quot; section makes clear that the silent assumption basically is &quot;you&#x27;re writing an online service&quot; (or an app that can afford quick update cycles).<p>In other fields, I have very different experiences with having dedicated QA, and working with QA can be a very collaborative process, especially where QA has domain expertise the developers do not have to the same degree. Setting them up to be in conflict is at least partially an organizational failure. (is codereview bad because it pits developers against other developers?) Along similar lines, test automation can be a tool that makes both jobs easier: it shortens feedback loops for developers, and allows QA to concentrate on things that are not easily covered by automation.