TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Danish study shows face masks have no significant effect

10 点作者 Trisell超过 4 年前

6 条评论

chadash超过 4 年前
Key point: no significant effect for protecting wearers. The study makes no claims (and didn't study) whether the masks protect others from the wearer.
评论 #25150161 未加载
评论 #25150732 未加载
thomascgalvin超过 4 年前
This headline is inaccurate to the point of malfeasance. The study absolutely did <i>not</i> look into whether masks have a significant effect on COVID-19 transmission; it tracked whether a medical doctor&#x27;s <i>recommendation to a patient</i> would reduce transmission.<p>One of the limitations called out in the paper was the fact that compliance with mask wearing was low, and&#x2F;or not tracked.
detaro超过 4 年前
Wasn&#x27;t the main argument for basic masks the entire time that they reduce <i>the wearer</i> spreading it if they are infected? And thus deriving &quot;no significant effect on spread&quot; from this finding seems a bit odd?
devwastaken超过 4 年前
Conclusion: The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use. The data were compatible with lesser degrees of self-protection.<p>If there&#x27;s those more qualified I&#x27;d be interested to know if these results are only being done on the receiving end, or if surgical masks still protect others to some extent.
raverbashing超过 4 年前
Danish studies that only suggest the use of masks and doesn&#x27;t control for adherence fails to find any results (original link <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.acpjournals.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.7326&#x2F;M20-6817" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.acpjournals.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.7326&#x2F;M20-6817</a> )<p>That&#x27;s it. It&#x27;s a crappy study and don&#x27;t expect much from &quot;The Spectator&quot;
jjgreen超过 4 年前
The paper itself: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.acpjournals.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.7326&#x2F;M20-6817" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.acpjournals.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.7326&#x2F;M20-6817</a>