TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Job Site Hired, Once Valued at $500M, Discusses Winding Down

50 点作者 raiyu超过 4 年前

11 条评论

vmception超过 4 年前
HIRED has never ever ever fulfilled its differentiating factor, never refined them, and periodically gutted all of them due to inability or disinterest in enforcing it. Or the reality just being that it didn&#x27;t have product market fit with employers.<p>Specifically:<p>- 48 hour response time (not enforced)<p>- bidding transparently on candidates (90% of the companies revealed a low ball offer in person after the fact, a mystery that is no different than not using Hired)<p>They should have just stuck with Dom Periognon redistribution.<p>It is probably a sustainable business and brand just as a tech recruiter and shedding all of its dead weight - like the massive valuation and creditors.
Kalium超过 4 年前
I remember using Hired, once upon a time. The vast majority of what I got through it was companies looking to stretch a budget of three peanuts to build some product on blockchain digital art collectible cards or similar.<p>It was generally not a positive experience. My handlers went out of the way to be nice, but it didn&#x27;t make up for an endless series of lowball offers from companies I didn&#x27;t want to work for.
评论 #25168207 未加载
mtmail超过 4 年前
&quot;CEO Douglas Feirstein, reached by phone on Thursday, said the company was in the process of being acquired but denied that it was shutting down. He said he was not at liberty to disclose the name of the buyer.<p>The San Francisco–based startup, founded in 2012 and recently valued privately at more than $500 million, came to prominence amid a tech hiring boom by helping companies such as Twitter, Airbnb and Lyft recruit workers. It raised more than $150 million from investors including Sierra Ventures, Crosslink Capital, Investment Management Corporation of Ontario and Lumia Capital.<p>Equity investors are not likely to get much, if any, of their investment back. Schaffer, the CFO, told shareholders that the board had verbally agreed to sell the company’s assets via an assignment for the benefit of creditors sale and that the special entity established for the process had already received a number of proposals for the assets. Hired does not expect to distribute any cash to shareholders after paying off creditors, he said.<p>“It is unlikely the sale will generate sufficient funds to pay all unsecured creditors in full,” the email read. “After the ABC sale transaction, Hired Inc. (which will own no assets) would be wound down and dissolved.”<p>Hired had been having trouble with its premium recruitment model even before the coronavirus pandemic roiled the job market. In 2019 it missed its revenue goals by more than 50%, according to people close to the company. Feirstein said he could not comment on its financial performance in that period. It now employs fewer than 80, down from about 250 at its peak, according to people familiar with the company.&quot;
hash872超过 4 年前
I&#x27;d be interested in understanding why recruiting as an industry hasn&#x27;t switched over to an hourly model. It&#x27;s basically semi-skilled (at best) professional services- why don&#x27;t companies just pay external recruiters per hour to find candidates, the same way you pay your accountant, attorney, etc.? (Though at a much lower rate, of course- $50 to an absolute max of $100 an hour).<p>It would likely be cheaper for the hiring companies, and ultimately aid both the company&#x27;s brand (no push recruiters on commission) and improve the industry overall (same). I understand that&#x27;s not a VC-backed model type of business, but does seem like a logical transition for the recruiting industry overall
评论 #25166251 未加载
评论 #25166712 未加载
评论 #25166122 未加载
howardr超过 4 年前
We used Hired to great success 4-5 years ago in Austin but overtime the quality of candidate went down. At a dinner with our account rep early on he said they spent $20k to acquire each candidate. Their pricing structure at the time was more like $25k&#x2F;yr for 20 introductions&#x2F;mo. My best guess is that over time they blew through all of their cash and had to spend a lot less on acquiring and vetting talent. At some point in the last two years they priced their product similarly to what a retained recruiter would (I don’t remember exactly but it was either 20k per hired candidate or 20% or first years salary), and they weren’t competitive
jtsiskin超过 4 年前
Why does Triplebyte seem to be doing great, while Hired is shutting down? They seem pretty similar in concept.<p>What’s the key difference?
评论 #25165293 未加载
评论 #25165629 未加载
nosefrog超过 4 年前
FWIW, I&#x27;ve only gotten low quality interviews through Hired.
评论 #25165229 未加载
crispyporkbites超过 4 年前
There was so much promise around this site and others, it turns out all the hype was just a marketing funnel into a standard recruitment consultancy.<p>There’s many others out there like this, unfortunately you can’t really change the shape of hiring with a tech solution from a startup, they all will regress back to hard hitting recruitment once they have a sales team with targets.
alasdair_超过 4 年前
A pity. I still remember receiving a bottle of Dom Perignon from them after signing on to a new job. They gave me $2000 as well, but the high-quality champagne was much more memorable.
评论 #25167229 未加载
gbuk2013超过 4 年前
Shame - I recently landed a nice new job through them, starting in a few weeks and it was a pretty smooth and pleasant process.
4778468d超过 4 年前
I heard someone say “Hired is going to wipe out all the recruiters when it come to your city”.<p>Yeah right.