TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Are you using EC2 metal instances?

3 点作者 riyakhanna1983超过 4 年前
Hi there! We have been using EC2 virtualized instances for hosting our crypto exchange. We are wondering if using EC2 metal instances would yield better performance. Is there anybody using EC2 metal instances? What's the performance like compared to virtualized instances, and what's your use case?

3 条评论

new23d超过 4 年前
Your use-case does not sound like it needs control over C-states and P-states [1].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.aws.amazon.com&#x2F;AWSEC2&#x2F;latest&#x2F;UserGuide&#x2F;processor_state_control.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.aws.amazon.com&#x2F;AWSEC2&#x2F;latest&#x2F;UserGuide&#x2F;processo...</a>
giaour超过 4 年前
I was on a team that used them because we needed to run our own virtualization layer, which standard EC2 instances disallow. I don’t recall seeing any performance difference compared to a comparably sized virtualized instance, but we weren’t really looking.<p>Especially on Nitro or Firecracker instances, I wouldn’t expect the “virtualization tax” to be very high, and metal instances come with some very real drawbacks in terms of capacity. E.g., it can be difficult to launch a new instance on demand if you will only accept an entire machine, and this can make auto scaling pretty dicey.<p>EC2 instances have per-second billing, so I would encourage you to run some realistic benchmarks on a variety of metal and non-metal instance types to see what (if any) performance benefit they would offer your application
uberman超过 4 年前
Is your bottleneck latency or throughput?