TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Sparkplugs ... no laserplugs

15 点作者 delinquentme大约 14 年前

3 条评论

CWuestefeld大约 14 年前
Sorry to quibble about grammar, but this error transforms your headline into its opposite.<p>What you really mean is "Sparkplugs ... no, laserplugs". You <i>really</i> need that comma following the "no", so it can stand alone rather than negate the laserplugs.
评论 #2523923 未加载
plusbryan大约 14 年前
Regardless if these plugs actually increase efficiency, their novelty will make them a commercial success. Who doesn't want a car with a Laser-Powered Engine(tm)?
tedjdziuba大约 14 年前
"The idea of replacing spark plugs - a technology that has changed little since their invention 150 years ago - with lasers is not a new one."<p>There's a reason that spark plug technology has not changed in 150 years: it works. The mechanism of a spark plug (and many mechanisms inside of an internal combustion engine) are so simple that they leave little room for mechanical failure.<p>Everyone likes to make the joke about "If Microsoft built cars", but there is some amount of truth to it - automobile engineers value simplicity far more than computer programmers do, as it has a direct effect on reliability. The reliability of a car is far more important than the reliability of an online chat application.<p>Spark plugs as they are now solve the problem, and are cheap. You can buy one for about $5 where I live. That one plug will last years. If by chance it does get dirty and start to fail, I can pull it out and clean it with a wire brush.<p>The "fuel efficiency gain" from a laser plug needs to be substantial to justify the complexity and expense. Leave it to journalists to ignore the practical side of a story and make it all 'science'.
评论 #2523934 未加载
评论 #2523832 未加载