Some of this I find immediately plausible. I would absolutely expect to find a positive correlation between "experience with doing technical interviews" and "likelihood of passing a technical interview." Plausible, easily verified with concrete, objective information.<p>The first half seems iffy to me, though. It sounds like you're performing a technical interview, then calling the result of that a measure of "skill," then using that to judge how well skill aligns with FAANG technical interviews. But what I think you're really measuring is the correlation between your own interview process and the FAANG interview process, which seems like a very different measurement.