TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Mutiny Within Anonymous May Have Exposed Hackers’ IP Addresses

26 点作者 omfut大约 14 年前

6 条评论

SwellJoe大约 14 年前
"Mutiny" has no meaning when there is no authority to which one can object. I don't know what the right word would be here, but it's definitely not "mutiny".<p>I also strongly suspect no one of any significance in this story is particularly worried about this exposure. Anyone smart who is participating in potentially illegal activities would be particularly careful about using proxies for sensitive work; and planning is definitely sensitive. I would also assume, were I a participant in Anonymous activities, that any site claiming to be representative of Anonymous has at least a 50% chance of being operated by the FBI or a rogue security company running black hat operations along the lines of HB Gary Federal. It'd be absolutely foolish to connect to such a site directly, and the members of Anonymous who are doing the real heavy lifting are probably not fools.
评论 #2530601 未加载
marshray大约 14 年前
Seems likely there's more going on here than meets the eye. Somebody's playing games. Either:<p>1. Anonymous does, in fact, have enough of a centralized leadership that they can pull off this kind of thing as an attention-getting disinformation tactic.<p>2. This "rogue admin" is working with the feds as part of some kind of deal. By releasing some info they get some people to panic, drop their defenses, generate chatter, and then they observe who's talking to whom and who's wiping their disks.<p>3. What do you know? Anarchists have their power struggles too. Anonymous may fail to maintain enough of an identity to remain relevant.<p>4. All of the above.
评论 #2530794 未加载
p4bl0大约 14 年前
&#62; Mutiny Within Anonymous May Have Exposed A Very Few Hackers And A Lot Of Scriptkiddies' IP Addresses.<p>FTFY. (And true hackers would have been behind proxies or using a public wifi network anyway).
ryoshu大约 14 年前
I would be especially concerned about the 127.0.0.1 addresses listed.
awakeasleep大约 14 年前
Better a visible internal betrayal than a long datasuck by an "Advanced Persistent Threat"<p>The whole Anonymous thing was getting a little too big, IMO, and needed something like this to fragment it and make the kids involved start thinking about the rest of their lives. I hope a few well meaning but naieve people quit while they're ahead, wipe their disks, and realize that some government agency has probably been tracking them down for a while &#38; that this is a blessing in disguise.
评论 #2530778 未加载
bxr大约 14 年前
&#62;several of the group’s sites had been hacked in a coup d’etat by an administrator who decided that he didn’t like the leaderless command structure that AnonOps Network Admins use.<p>Thats poor planning. A coup doesn't work within an structure where the only authority is whoever you feel like going along with today. Then again anonymous is a train-wreck happening again and again powered only by internet drama, so I can't say I'm surprised.