TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Librem 5 Evergreen vs. Pinephone

176 点作者 ThatGeoGuy超过 4 年前

23 条评论

O1111OOO超过 4 年前
&gt; For the vast majority of people, the Librem 5 and Pinephone are probably not worth even considering. The GNU userspace and associated “mobile” paradigms within it are very much not ready for daily use.<p>&gt; Linux phones are definitely not yet ready to be daily drivers<p>Despite the author making this point twice and some of the negativity regarding Purism&#x27;s pricing - I still feel very good about the state of Linux phones and the incredible work these two entities are doing. We can&#x27;t lose sight of this.<p>It wasn&#x27;t too long ago that the mere mention of a Linux phone was pure fantasy. We now have two companies (and two passionate communities) that are helping move Open Source Linux forward. I&#x27;m still very excited about how things are developing and the trickle down effect it will have as we move forward.<p>&gt; One of the neat things about the Pinephone is the ability to boot and use a variety of Linux distributions on the hardware itself. It’s as easy as loading the distro onto an SD card, and then booting the phone. You don’t even have to flash anything to the internal eMMC in order to run it!<p>This is such a killer feature for me - while also providing a modern-ish platform for the various distributions and app developers to test their wares. It&#x27;s probably the biggest single most important thing about the PinePhone right now.<p>No more unsuccessful rooting, flashing and possibly bricking. No more nagging feeling that you are merely renting a device and are constantly at the whim of a corporate overlord (which never ends well).<p>I think, like the author, I&#x27;m a bit more excited about the flexibility of the PinePhone but acknowledge the importance of the work Purism is doing to try and bring a First Tier Linux phone to market. We all benefit from this.
评论 #25342198 未加载
评论 #25340276 未加载
评论 #25344313 未加载
评论 #25342718 未加载
评论 #25342863 未加载
评论 #25343886 未加载
fsflover超过 4 年前
About the USA-made version of Librem 5:<p>&gt; it’s kind of appalling that literally anyone would pay this much. It’s kind of appalling that Purism would charge this much. I can imagine a scheme where the parts are shipped from China, and verified and assembled by a part-time college student in the States and they’d likely still be able to price it cheaper than $1999.00.<p>There are definitely valid reasons not to buy Chinese products: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boycott_Chinese_products" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boycott_Chinese_products</a>. Also what are the other competing smartphones which are made in USA?
评论 #25339085 未加载
评论 #25339398 未加载
评论 #25339414 未加载
评论 #25339718 未加载
phh超过 4 年前
When reading this, it feels like the goal of those projects have derived?<p>For me, the &quot;goal&quot; of mainline GNU&#x2F;Linux smartphones is that we get like PCs. I prefer fedora, you prefer Debian, they prefer Slackware, all is well, we are all free to choose whatever we want for our computer.<p>Here I&#x27;m reading it&#x27;s all fragmented? And if it&#x27;s fragmented, I guess it means it doesn&#x27;t rely enough on Linux drivers, so long term support won&#x27;t be there?<p>Is someone &quot;wrong&quot;? Like Librem is saying they are going mainline but actually aren&#x27;t? Or is it Pinephone? Or I&#x27;m misrepreaentating what mainline should mean?
评论 #25339849 未加载
评论 #25339691 未加载
ansible超过 4 年前
&gt; <i>Both phones can run fairly hot. I think given how I hold the phone (closer to the base of the phone) I tend to notice the Librem 5 more often than I notice the Pinephone getting hotter. This is mostly because the frame &#x2F; chassis for the Librem 5 is metal, and conducts the heat around the sides of the phone. So you’ll notice it getting hot after you’ve used your phone for a good bit.</i><p>Power management is complex these days. You&#x27;ll often get a minimal implementation from the chip vendor, and it is a fair amount of work to really polish the lower level support. On top of that, you have to integrate this with the rest of the OS, so that active apps can increase the clocks, which then get automatically scaled back as system load decreases. So there&#x27;s a lot to do on the userspace side as well.
评论 #25342847 未加载
fsflover超过 4 年前
&gt; It’s obviously not really appropriate to compare the Librem 5 and the Pinephone spec for spec.<p>If you still want to do it, check this: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forums.puri.sm&#x2F;t&#x2F;comparing-specs-of-upcoming-linux-phones&#x2F;6827" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forums.puri.sm&#x2F;t&#x2F;comparing-specs-of-upcoming-linux-p...</a>.
Abishek_Muthian超过 4 年前
I&#x27;m impressed with the rate of progress in the Linux distros for smartphones due to these devices, especially the Pinephone as it&#x27;s more accessible.<p>But I honestly expected few major phone manufacturers to join these development effort in some manner after seeing the fate of Huawei with Android or specifically Google Play Services&#x2F;OHA(Open Handset Alliance), I&#x27;m surprised it didn&#x27;t happen yet or perhaps it&#x27;s because of OHA it&#x27;s not happening.<p>Tizen didn&#x27;t work out for smartphones although it seems to be gaining market share in wearables, why not direct the smartphone investment part of it to PostmarketOS, UBPorts etc. I presume Linux Foundation has to play a role in it.
评论 #25343332 未加载
floatboth超过 4 年前
Meanwhile in the &quot;repurpose existing phones&quot; camp: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.postmarketos.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;SDM845_Mainlining" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.postmarketos.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;SDM845_Mainlining</a><p>Yeah, sure, the Librem5&#x2F;Pinephone boot directly into open source firmware instead of some Qualcomm monstrosity that even acts as a hypervisor, but. Near-mainline Linux with GPU support on actually powerful devices with 3-ish-GHz fast cores, 8GiB RAM, and so on. And you can buy these on the used market rather than investing in more new e-waste.
评论 #25343709 未加载
评论 #25344011 未加载
mike-cardwell超过 4 年前
I&#x27;m surprised battery life isn&#x27;t mentioned. My understanding is that it&#x27;s abysmal for Librem 5? I could live with a phone that has software issues, but I can&#x27;t live with a phone that spends most of the day turned off because it needs charging every few hours...
评论 #25344028 未加载
Causality1超过 4 年前
I&#x27;m all for more variety of hardware and more control over software. That said, what makes these a better option, for anyone, than buying an android phone with an unlockable bootloader and loading a Google-less version of Android on it?
评论 #25340669 未加载
评论 #25342918 未加载
评论 #25339819 未加载
评论 #25344042 未加载
评论 #25340814 未加载
评论 #25342297 未加载
评论 #25343105 未加载
beyondcompute超过 4 年前
It’s not obvious for me why wouldn’t they install better cameras. For me camera system is one of the most important parts of a smartphone specification. Don’t those makers realize that there are people for whom those things are important?
评论 #25343553 未加载
评论 #25343015 未加载
评论 #25344022 未加载
s_gourichon超过 4 年前
<p><pre><code> I *did not* &#x2F; will *not* test: Phone calls &amp; SMS &#x2F; MMS functionality I haven’t bothered plugging them into a display. Email (...) I’ve been too lazy to try setting this up Cameras GPS &#x2F; location </code></pre> Anyone who expected an article like &quot;I actually tested those phones in real life and will tell if they are actually suitable as phones&quot;, don&#x27;t expect.<p>(Article is not empty, does mentions how these machines behave on the GUI side, data-only SIM, web browsing, music, charging.)
评论 #25348211 未加载
blendergeek超过 4 年前
I should point out that very little of this article compares the hardware of these two devices. This article has two main comparisons. One of these is Pine64 vs Purism and the others Phosh vs LoMiri. For those who haven&#x27;t read the article but want to quickly skim to the sections with actual comparison between the Librem 5 and the Pinephone, here are the relevant headers:<p>- Kill Switches<p>- Charging the battery<p>- Temperature<p>- Phone shape<p>The rest of the article is not about Librem 5 vs Pinephone. While the sections on the apps could have compared the two phones, instead they compare two operating systems. I would have loved a discussion of the performance differences between the two phones or the screen brightness or the speakers. However, most of this article is largely irrelevant to the phones.
amosbatto超过 4 年前
ThatGeoGuy, Since you called me that &quot;crazy uncle at Thankgiving,&quot; I feel that the &quot;crazy uncle&quot; should have a chance to respond to the arguments that you made in your review: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forums.puri.sm&#x2F;t&#x2F;pinephone-vs-librem-5&#x2F;9092&#x2F;83" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forums.puri.sm&#x2F;t&#x2F;pinephone-vs-librem-5&#x2F;9092&#x2F;83</a>
cookiengineer超过 4 年前
I own a Pinephone with the latest revision board which was bought in the July 31st batch this year (and got shipped in September&#x2F;November within the EU).<p>I have to say that hardware-wise, the Pinephone got very _very_ far already. It&#x27;s an amazing hacker&#x27;s device, especially with the USB-C host.<p>The only issue that persists is software. Phosh is pretty much useless because not a single app will work as a real mobile app, let alone act in a responsive manner with their underlying design philosophies. It all feels like Android 1.x, which was barely useable outside the context of shitty car navigation handhelds.<p>The available cross-compiled versions of Browsers (e.g. Firefox or Chromium) are totally broken, as they are made for Desktop and do not even downscale their user interface, and are neither responsive anyhow. So for now, I am using my own (prototypical) Browser Stealth [1] due to lack for alternatives because there at least the UI doesn&#x27;t crash every few seconds when being used within a WebKit2GTK webview.<p>I don&#x27;t have many requirements for my phone, to be honest. I don&#x27;t use social apps, and only communicate via telegram. But currently the amount of software that&#x27;s available for phosh is still the one reminding me of a developer environment or say, an Android emulator image.<p>I seriously thought about taking ownership in creating a few apps for it, like one for openstreetmaps, notes, text editor, which are the more important ones for me.<p>But to be bluntly honest, I don&#x27;t even know where to start with the whole GTK shitshow. It&#x27;s absolutely impossible to develop an app without any working examples. There&#x27;s no non-auto-transpiled-bindings-documentation, there&#x27;s no libhandy examples that actually work, and there&#x27;s certainly not any responsive GTK app examples that would show how to make a &quot;real mobile&quot; app. How do people develop apps for mobile GTK?<p>Seriously, I cannot understand it. I want to, but there&#x27;s no way anyone can keep the mood up digging through a _mobile phone&#x27;s gdb output while the on screen keyboard crashed_ to figure out how the API works.<p>I think what GTK really needs is something like Electron, but maybe based on WebKit2GTK and (maybe?) gjs. Something that allows bundling your assets to build an app that is offline-ready, and is easy to build with common methodologies of UI frameworks.<p>Because currently I don&#x27;t see the reason why libhandy exists. It tries to fix a problem, and doesn&#x27;t fix the underlying cause. GTK boxes and their layouting (and reflow?) concept just isn&#x27;t made for an adaptive&#x2F;responsive UI, so you&#x27;ll always end up with a totally broken UX by modern standards. (You&#x27;re welcome to challenge me on this, but as long as &quot;make a sidebar that can fade-in&#x2F;fade-out with a swipe&quot; takes more than a week to build, I think you&#x27;re wrong.)<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;tholian-network&#x2F;stealth" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;tholian-network&#x2F;stealth</a>
评论 #25343594 未加载
评论 #25344790 未加载
评论 #25346966 未加载
asjkaehauisa超过 4 年前
I really like alternatives, but imo AOSP is really secure and private OS. What I need is a AOSP smartphone with frequently OTA updates (like in Pixel&#x27;s phone), working out of box.<p>I wouldn&#x27;t compromise my security by choosing one of this smartphones.
评论 #25346614 未加载
评论 #25345564 未加载
seba_dos1超过 4 年前
It&#x27;s worth noting that postmarketOS and Mobian already support Librem 5, and running other distros like Arch, Fedora etc. on it by yourself is not a challenge for someone reasonably comfortable with GNU&#x2F;Linux. Running Plasma Mobile via pmOS is a no brainer, and I&#x27;ve almost got UBports (Ubuntu Touch) to run there already as well (it struggled with one quirk of the etnaviv driver last time I tried it, resulting in garbled display content, but it worked otherwise).
paulcarroty超过 4 年前
There&#x27;s the third way: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.postmarketos.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Devices" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.postmarketos.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Devices</a><p>You can buy the used devices cheaper than Pinephone and play with them. Not perfect hardware support, but enough for hackable mobile device with privacy and low-distraction mode.
评论 #25344585 未加载
mark_l_watson超过 4 年前
For now, I sort of trust Apple enough on privacy and security, PRISM disclosures and their being a huge corporation.<p>What will get me to buy a product like Librem or Pinephone in the future would be as a universal device, that is a dock that would make it my only digital device - and feel secure against hacks, etc.
fsflover超过 4 年前
Discussion on the Purism forum: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forums.puri.sm&#x2F;t&#x2F;pinephone-vs-librem-5&#x2F;9092&#x2F;81" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forums.puri.sm&#x2F;t&#x2F;pinephone-vs-librem-5&#x2F;9092&#x2F;81</a>.
BenGosub超过 4 年前
I have a question, does Google&#x27;s Android licenses allow Android apps to be used on non-android operating systems?<p>I know that some Google provided APIs will be missing, but still, we could soon have alternatives, like OpenStreet for maps.
m463超过 4 年前
&gt; It too has kill-switches, but these are not easy to access on the side of the phone and instead are inside the case of the phone.<p>Ha, I can&#x27;t help but think this is something linux folks won&#x27;t even think twice about. :)
评论 #25342861 未加载
DobryMorozov超过 4 年前
I wonder if they have ever tried to shop their tech to China. Chinese mobile companies are interested in building an alternative mobile operating system and have the resources to make it work
kevsim超过 4 年前
Kind of annoying to have a review and not have a single picture of the phones, screenshots, etc. Yes, I can google them myself, but c&#x27;mon.<p>Also $1999 and the camera doesn&#x27;t work yet? Yikes.