TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Signs You’re Building a World-Class Team

44 点作者 domrdy超过 4 年前

8 条评论

_benj超过 4 年前
&gt; Hire someone if this will be their career-defining role — they are on the cusp of their career... They will do everything it takes to succeed.<p>I have mixed feelings about this. One one hand finding people that haven&#x27;t been spoiled by big tech and are still excited and enthusiastic about making a difference is huge for a company. But that &quot;they will do everything it takes to succeed&quot; sound like it could be used to the detriment of the employee.
评论 #25356462 未加载
nsgi超过 4 年前
Ask whether you really need a world-class team or just a competent one
评论 #25348499 未加载
Jugurtha超过 4 年前
Remove founders who have a reputation. Remove being part of an accelerator&#x2F;incubator. Remove VC backing. Remove being in a &quot;tech&quot; hub.<p>Now we&#x27;re cooking with wood! One way to view this in my opinion is what do you do with what you have, how do you build a learning organization that overcomes obstacles whatever they are, how do you grow with that organization and attract people who are better than you are at what you do, especially when you&#x27;re in &quot;putting down fires&quot;.<p>How do you build a product that enables the team to win and attract talent when you don&#x27;t have the infrastructure &#x2F; credentials &#x2F; backing, etc.
908B64B197超过 4 年前
Something to keep in mind is: World Class talent has world class opportunities.<p>And a lot of them simply won&#x27;t be visible on the market at any given time.
ipnon超过 4 年前
Bit tautalogical these<p>We have similar ironclad principles to only hire the best at my company<p>And yet somehow they all missed the memo and ended up at Squarespace anyway
mikesabbagh超过 4 年前
I think velocity is the most important indicator, at least at the start. How fast can you build and ship? I saw startups spending a year, and they could not launch a website. Same thing in enterprises too. A team gets formed around a project and they start building everything including a highly sophisticated pipeline, feature toggles and multi cluster deployment; but the product is still not close yet. Velocity is my indicator for team success. Just ask how long have u been developing before joining any team.
doonesbury超过 4 年前
I continue to be unimpressed by articles on teams, team building in Hackernews. This article is another one. It seems more like sales and marketing article, and as a sales and marketing writeup, it is a very thin veneer with foggy bits of truth that doesn&#x27;t move the bar at all.<p>If you want to quit messing around with fog and &quot;hit it&quot; right, directly, and fundamentally, then buy two books:<p>- Human Element: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Human-Element-Productivity-Self-Esteem-Management&#x2F;dp&#x2F;1555426123&#x2F;ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=human+element+books+schutz&amp;qid=1607535030&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Human-Element-Productivity-Self-Estee...</a><p>- Total Quality Management the Japanese Way: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;What-Total-Quality-Control-Management&#x2F;dp&#x2F;013952441X&#x2F;ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=total+quality+management+the+japanese+way&amp;qid=1607535069&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;What-Total-Quality-Control-Management...</a><p>That&#x27;s what? Not even $10 total for used copies. Can&#x27;t beat that! Here&#x27;s why these are good books:<p>The Human Element book cuts through all the crap on teams, on why they work, why they don&#x27;t. The central thesis: Teams are broken by individuals. Individuals are broken when they engage in defensive, fixed, unchanging behavior. And that modality happens when the context in which the individual works hits their self esteem negatively. If the individual lacks self-awareness their coping behaviors and ability to learn, change is significantly reduced. Then what behavior you&#x27;ll see will make things worse. This ought to strike you as real: a manager&#x27;s worse assignee is a person with whom they&#x27;ve had &quot;the talk&quot; but things don&#x27;t change. Human Element is also extremely operational in nature: it provides a toolset to do, to engage, to measure, to check, and to move on beyond stuck. Once you get this, you&#x27;ll be far better able to place the OP&#x27;s piece in context to greater effect.<p>On the Ishikawa book (TQM the Japanese way) don&#x27;t get too focused on &quot;Japan&quot;, although during the 80s&#x2F;90s Japan was kicking butt. In Japan the highest award for organizational and quality excellence is the Deming Award. Deming was an American who was well received in Japan. So what&#x27;s at work here really are universal truths for all human organizations. It deals with teams in the larger context of human organizations. In software company culture is all the more important. TQM&#x27;s focus is what quality means. Quality like &quot;international relations&quot; or &quot;global economy&quot; immediately comes with notions on what it means. But when you drill in to it, the certainty turns into its own kind of fog. This book helps you press your understanding to getting down to fundamentals that companies will never outgrow.<p>Both books are short reads. And very information packed. The TQM book was extremely well translated from Japanese; I applaud the translator. Ishikawa would be considered an industry leader, and an excellent example of a manager with Drucker know-how but real, on the job experience in manufacturing.
MadisonGraciey超过 4 年前
Empower that talent through a culture of ownership and transparency. Invest heavily in them as the company’s future leaders.
评论 #25350356 未加载
评论 #25350269 未加载