TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Follow Your Curiosity. Read Your Ass Off

93 点作者 SparksZilla超过 4 年前

8 条评论

miles超过 4 年前
And, at a certain point, be on guard against too much reading, as Einstein warned[1]:<p>&gt; <i>Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking, just as the man who spends too much time in the theater is tempted to be content with living vicariously instead of living his own life.</i><p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.saturdayeveningpost.com&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;satevepost&#x2F;einstein.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.saturdayeveningpost.com&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;sateve...</a>
评论 #25349445 未加载
评论 #25361713 未加载
评论 #25354033 未加载
评论 #25357009 未加载
评论 #25350886 未加载
评论 #25349585 未加载
评论 #25349471 未加载
评论 #25351327 未加载
评论 #25356540 未加载
评论 #25354853 未加载
cambalache超过 4 年前
This is not even a properly disguised advertisement. Content free and full of fluff. Keep pieces like this in mind when HN as a group want to boast it is somewhat better than the other forums on the Internet. God I miss old Slashdot.
kthejoker2超过 4 年前
My own personal take is &quot;only read something if you intend to teach it to someone else.&quot; Otherwise the stakes are too low.<p>There has to be a pretty even balance between consume and produce. I think the ratio is probably 30&#x2F;70, but whatever your personal ratio is, make sure both sides are serving the other - consume to produce, take feedback from what you produce to consume more.
评论 #25353413 未加载
Lierre超过 4 年前
While the main advise seems useful, &quot;if you get interest in a thing, read a ton about it&quot;, this article is quite misleading. Not all sources are relevant, I don&#x27;t know about Buddhism, but psychology is mentioned with psychoanalysis and it&#x27;s not a science, while psychology is. Seems more about a new-age thing than really seeking correct information.
评论 #25349213 未加载
评论 #25349520 未加载
conductr超过 4 年前
Be Curious is maybe the first step. I’m not a big reader but I’m frequently curious and end up reading a lot because of it. I also look for the shortest path to info gathering. If I can read an article instead of a book. Or a list instead of an article. I’m all for it. If something piques a further curiosity, I can always find more content.
ErikAugust超过 4 年前
The author of this post is &quot;building a new way to publish books online.&quot;<p>So I figure he wants us all to read as much as possible.
评论 #25350785 未加载
gottareply2020超过 4 年前
&#x27;and take notes&#x27; would be my follow-up to the article. Unless you&#x27;ve got a photographic memory, taking notes forces you to:<p>1. map&#x2F;filter&#x2F;reduce what you&#x27;re reading for easy reference later, and 2. add your own observations&#x2F;opinions&#x2F;connections in real-time
grammarnazzzi超过 4 年前
Ooooo. An edgey PSA. Read my &quot;ass&quot; off.<p>Thanks for the advice. What&#x27;s your next tip?<p>&gt; Get Attention: Post Your Ass Off<p>Who upvotes this nonsense?