This is pretty cool. One thing tho:<p>The @routename construct is <i>still</i> not explained in the documentation, but used in that documentation.<p>I hate to be this guy, but I pointed that out to the mailing list before the last release, along with a request for advice on how to proceed with fixing the docs, and got no reply. I figured since Zed bragged about fixing the routing docs, they would have included some sort of mention of the mysterious symbol, but alas, no.