TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Why do AWS, Azure, and GCP charge so much for outbound data transfer?

19 点作者 Kareem71超过 4 年前
Some cloud providers seem to be able to offer a much better deal i.e https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.digitalocean.com&#x2F;pricing&#x2F;<p>whats the logic behind their data pricing structure?

6 条评论

gostsamo超过 4 年前
Keeping your data hostage. The more you have with them, the more you will have to pay in order to go to the competition. And wherever is your data, there must be your highly-paid services that utilize it.
评论 #25440025 未加载
kohanz超过 4 年前
Some providers provide great pricing and service, but please, unless your project is a hobby project, do not use DO&#x27;s storage and CDN solution (called Spaces) in production. Made that mistake once and caused a lot of headache and regret. In fact, if you&#x27;re considering DO at all for production, subscribe to their status page for a steady stream of incidents to your inbox. And if it&#x27;s not an incident, it a 2-day long &quot;maintenance&quot; that gets announced literally one minute before it starts. I&#x27;ve stayed subscribed partially for the comedy of it at this point (migrated away from DO a while ago). DO engineering and devops must be a lively place.<p>As for the pricing reason, part of it is reliability, but part is that all of the other product offerings (which are available at the big players and not elsewhere) are subsidized by these costs that everyone needs. For example, Amazon Cognito is dirt cheap, why do you think that is? Come for the X, Y, Z and make us money back through storage&#x2F;egress.
tiernano超过 4 年前
I dont completely agree with the pricing, dont get me wrong, but i can see why they do it... You are not just paying for bandwidth. You are paying for the rest of the infrastructure. So, for example, in Azure&#x27;s case (which is what we use in $dayjob) we get VNETs, NSGs (basic firewalls), Routes, DNS, IP Addressing, etc, plus then bandwidth. Yes, i would like the bandwidth bill to be cheaper, but you also need to look, again, in the case of Azure, of the rest of what they are offering in a global network and number of POPs around the world...
评论 #25442719 未加载
lrossi超过 4 年前
It’s a matter of supply and demand.<p>Most of the cloud customers are using it to serve data more than receiving data. Meanwhile, the cloud providers are connected to the Internet via mostly symmetrical links. This means that they are underutilized in the upload direction, and loaded in the download direction. So they charge more in the direction where there is demand.<p>Download traffic is not the only one that is costly. Traffic between their datacenters from different regions may be billed as well.
aaccount超过 4 年前
Cloud providers are full of hidden costs
speedgoose超过 4 年前
Because they can.<p>Check Hetzner, OVH, or Scaleway too.
评论 #25448379 未加载