TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Railway Clearing House (1936)

56 点作者 jpkoning超过 4 年前

4 条评论

Doctor_Fegg超过 4 年前
The Railway Clearing House’s Junction Diagrams are on Wikimedia Commons, and truly beautiful cartography:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;commons.m.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Category:Railways_Junctions_Diagram_1914" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;commons.m.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Category:Railways_Junct...</a>
评论 #25577998 未加载
pm90超过 4 年前
Always enjoy reading how these complex systems “emerge”. I found this part interesting:<p>&gt; The railways included in the RCH system had increased by 1845 to sixteen, with 656 route-miles of track. The difficulties of obtaining cash settlement between the railway companies and the clearing house, led in 1850 to the passing of an Act of Parliament conferring on the RCH the right to sue in the courts. This ended the trouble and the companies subsequently settled all payments promptly.<p>It seems like just the right amount of regulatory power to get everyone on the same page and ensure the system works.
Reason077超过 4 年前
Modern equivalent: Rail Settlement Plan<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Rail_Settlement_Plan" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Rail_Settlement_Plan</a>
评论 #25577587 未加载
评论 #25580479 未加载
capnahab超过 4 年前
Very interesting, I always wondered how that worked. Also the huge loss of track, - 23000 miles in 1936, 10000 today.
评论 #25577158 未加载