Bunch Co-Founder and CTO here.<p>We built an iOS app for personalized 2-minute leadership tips (think Duolingo for learning how to lead or just work better in teams).<p>One of the challenges we've run into is the fact that there are several different working styles - there's no universal "right" way to lead. We found an interesting way to solve this problem using a model from Stanford. Here's a quick write up, that I hope you'll find interesting both from a technical perspective and for leading/building teams.
Looks interesting. I can see this picking up. I'm wondering though, what's the difference between this and other tests? I've gone through many different ones and always a bit skeptical.
What’s the difference between this and personality profiling? I know many of those personality tests aren't scientific, so how this one differs from, for example, tests like 16 personalities?
Can you include a link to the research from Stanford?<p>It feels strange to see vague claims that this is based on “model from Stanford” with zero citations or even attribution to the model.