TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Facts won't fix this: experts on how to fight America's disinformation crisis

34 点作者 scottbucks超过 4 年前

7 条评论

zug_zug超过 4 年前
I think this is an important topic, but couching it in this brief cultural moment or one political party is cutting scope a lot.<p>For example, rather than rants and raves about a particular ex-president or party, there are plenty of highly-auditable voting systems, which I remember being pretty vocal about 10 years ago. Things like paper trails matter a lot [1]. Theoretically, both sides should be in perfect agreement on the importance of that...<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; “If only 20% of the population is like, ‘You’re not my president, I’m going to double down on my mask resistance,’ or ‘I’m going to continue to have parties over the holidays,’ that means we are going to be even less likely to bring this thing under control,”<p>No. I think this kind of whining is only giving&#x2F;attributing power to the losing fraction. 30% of Americans still supported Nixon even AFTER he got caught at watergate. Certainly 30% of Americans were unhappy about desegregation in those areas. Too bad for them.<p>1 - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;End-to-end_auditable_voting_systems" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;End-to-end_auditable_voting_sy...</a>
评论 #25604849 未加载
raarts超过 4 年前
Looking at the US from the outside, it seems there are two increasingly separated views of what is true and what isn&#x27;t. Each is in their own bubble. Both bubbles are around the same size.<p>This article is from an outlet in one bubble labeling everything from the other bubble as misinformation, and asking rethorically: &#x27;can the divide be healed?&#x27; Without realizing they actually mean: &#x27;how can we make them understand they are wrong?&#x27;<p>This happens on both sides. Until both bubbles will ask themselves: &#x27;is it possible the other side has some points, so let&#x27;s give it a good look&#x27;, there will be NO healing at all.<p>And actually both sides are as often wrong as they are right on many issues.
评论 #25607392 未加载
LatteLazy超过 4 年前
It&#x27;s pretty well proven that even scientists don&#x27;t change their minds when presented with new evidence. Instead, you have to wait for the existing people to literally die out. Then a new generation can have new ideas. Progress is a matter of time and attrition, like a glacier moving. It&#x27;s not a matter of logic and openness and evidence and debate.<p>We need to wait for people who believe whatever Facebook&#x2F;Fox shows them to die, they will never stop believing it as long as they draw breath.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.mit.edu&#x2F;2019&#x2F;life-science-funding-researchers-die-0829" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.mit.edu&#x2F;2019&#x2F;life-science-funding-researchers-d...</a>
评论 #25606718 未加载
boomboomsubban超过 4 年前
Wouldn&#x27;t the same intrinsic dismissal of &quot;election officials&quot; described I&#x27;m the article apply to the use of &quot;experts&quot; in the article&#x27;s title?
评论 #25605600 未加载
sunstone超过 4 年前
Sure but what will fix it is a tax payer funded, independent (like the courts), news organization. Almost every other liberal democracy has something like that. It&#x27;s time for the US to get with the program.
评论 #25606664 未加载
egberts1超过 4 年前
Concise messaging matters. #headduck
thatguy0900超过 4 年前
It seems kind of disengenuous to blame this on trump and right wing outlets. They definetely pushed distrust of the media along, but how long could the media really expect to keep getting away with things like Iraq wmds? It seems like things were going to reach this point sooner or later anyway when mainstream media started agreeing to become propaganda machines
评论 #25604898 未加载
评论 #25604252 未加载
评论 #25607017 未加载
评论 #25604767 未加载