TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Scientists Believe US Embassy and CIA Officers Hit with High-Power Microwaves

37 点作者 paulyg超过 4 年前

6 条评论

alan-crowe超过 4 年前
When I worked in radar, the people in the transmitter lab had little, hand held, microwave detectors as an additional layer of safety. If a wave guide hadn&#x27;t been assembled correctly and was leaking microwaves, they would be warned before they were cooked. This was 1980. Such gadgets should be very cheap today.<p>Given the history, with the Great Seal Bug<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Thing_(listening_device)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Thing_(listening_device)</a><p>I would expect plenty of monitoring; it is cheap and easy.
jaybrendansmith超过 4 年前
We appear to be right back to the original explanation, an exposure to high-energy microwaves. I&#x27;d be curious to know if this is clearly an attack, or if this &#x27;Frey effect&#x27; could happen accidentally because of nearby microwave transmission or similar?
gabrielblack超过 4 年前
What about misused or defective radio equipment ? I guess that they have powerful microwave sat equipment, in there. This is a more reasonable explanation then mysterious &quot;death ray&quot; that, anyway, should be detectable and traceable with the right equipment, in case someone want to prove its existence. Moreover, what&#x27;s the logic in creating a gratuitous diplomatic incident and possibly cause reprisals against the responsible ? IMHO , this story is the perfect click bait so nobody want to consider more logic and simple explanations.
lolc超过 4 年前
What I don&#x27;t get about this explanation is that I&#x27;d expect high-profile embassies to be at least monitored for radio activity or even shielded against it.<p>But maybe I&#x27;m just expecting too much vigilance here.
评论 #25625208 未加载
评论 #25623912 未加载
netsharc超过 4 年前
1. The article is a copy of the original: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theconversation.com&#x2F;scientists-suggest-us-embassies-were-hit-with-high-power-microwaves-heres-how-the-weapons-work-151730" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theconversation.com&#x2F;scientists-suggest-us-embassies-...</a> . I wonder if scitechdaily is just a content farm or if they had a license to copy that content.<p>2. This Vanity Fair article believes it&#x27;s mass hysteria: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.vanityfair.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;2019&#x2F;01&#x2F;the-real-story-behind-the-havana-embassy-mystery" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.vanityfair.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;2019&#x2F;01&#x2F;the-real-story-behin...</a>
评论 #25623011 未加载
redsummer超过 4 年前
I’ve heard the Great Seal Bug described as being activated by microwaves, and wonder if all these embassies and offices were riddled with similar bugs.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Thing_(listening_device)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Thing_(listening_device)</a>
评论 #25625110 未加载