My question for all you smart data-oriented people is: why are we not considering the pandemic all but over? Particularly since the only study on asymptomatic cases has failed to prove transmissibility [0]? I know the results are "not generalizable" because of variable viral load, but you'd think we'd have better science available before implementing such draconian measures.<p>Related to the posted link: <a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelYeadon3" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/MichaelYeadon3</a><p>[0] <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/11/201130131511.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/11/201130131511.h...</a>