TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Trump bans Alipay and seven other Chinese apps

224 点作者 tigerlily超过 4 年前

26 条评论

hmate9超过 4 年前
These bans also seem kind of weird after the TikTok ban. They were supposed to find a US buyer or leave the US market. They’ve done neither and are still live.
评论 #25658421 未加载
评论 #25657068 未加载
评论 #25659506 未加载
评论 #25666143 未加载
评论 #25660868 未加载
评论 #25661028 未加载
评论 #25660167 未加载
评论 #25664447 未加载
评论 #25660256 未加载
评论 #25657032 未加载
AnonymousPlanet超过 4 年前
So when American companies invade the privacy of European citizens its okay, but when Chinese companies do the same with American citizens this is "digital totalitarianism"? Anyone care to explain this to me?
评论 #25657293 未加载
评论 #25657571 未加载
评论 #25657441 未加载
评论 #25657935 未加载
评论 #25657908 未加载
评论 #25657287 未加载
评论 #25660251 未加载
评论 #25659240 未加载
评论 #25661067 未加载
评论 #25658134 未加载
评论 #25660086 未加载
评论 #25657670 未加载
评论 #25657362 未加载
评论 #25658527 未加载
评论 #25660343 未加载
评论 #25657292 未加载
评论 #25657330 未加载
mtw超过 4 年前
I don&#x27;t understand why Russia is doing obviously hostile acts (elections, hacking government agencies, invasion of Ukraine &amp; others, covert operations and so on...) against the US, and not much is done.<p>Meanwhile, I can&#x27;t remember a covert operation done by China or a visible invasion of a third-party country (except putting concrete on a few inhabited islands) and then everything is done to portray them as the bad guys and ban entire industries<p>I can&#x27;t help thinking of either racism, or politicians being controlled by Russian intelligence (possibly them not being unaware of this)
评论 #25657657 未加载
评论 #25657450 未加载
评论 #25658451 未加载
评论 #25658383 未加载
评论 #25657791 未加载
评论 #25657422 未加载
评论 #25660382 未加载
IfOnlyYouKnew超过 4 年前
&gt; The order, which takes effect in 45 days ...<p>US democracy can be seriously threatened by an administration incapable of using a calendar, apparently.
评论 #25657090 未加载
评论 #25659296 未加载
newdude116超过 4 年前
I am not sure about WeChat pay, yes, there might be security issues. On the other hand, China is blocking a lot of western apps. From play store, facebook, gmail, whatsapp to tinder.<p>And there are indeed cases you ask yourself what might be the real motivation of the owner: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;03&#x2F;06&#x2F;grindr-sold-china-national-security&#x2F;?guccounter=1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;03&#x2F;06&#x2F;grindr-sold-china-national...</a>
someperson超过 4 年前
I&#x27;m surprised no action was taken against WPS Office until now.<p>I&#x27;m surprised AirDroid wasn&#x27;t on this list though. It gives the government of China full remote access to millions of Android devices, including many in sensitive corporate environments.
评论 #25657529 未加载
didgeoridoo超过 4 年前
Can anyone explain how CamScanner fits into all this? I thought it was just a scanning app — can you send money with it?
评论 #25656985 未加载
评论 #25658204 未加载
评论 #25657364 未加载
评论 #25656988 未加载
contingencies超过 4 年前
This is a bad move by the US. In the short term it creates political impact, but in the long term it merely cements a multilateral world as we all have to implement multiple payment systems to reach disparate markets. The key beneficiary of that is China. With Alibaba now getting squashed by both the Chinese and US governments, I guess Bezos will think twice before stepping in to consumer payments.
评论 #25660145 未加载
sneak超过 4 年前
If America wants to claim some sort of moral superiority in this stupid pissing match, it becomes quite difficult to do so when engaging in the same kind of bullshit state censorship that other countries routinely engage in.<p>Oh well. Maybe this will accelerate the move toward app platforms that can&#x27;t be so easily censored arbitrarily by the state.
villgax超过 4 年前
Facebook&#x2F;Google does the same thing just owned by different govt. WHo&#x27;s to say what happens to a Russian&#x2F;Indian&#x2F;Sri-Lankan app that poses some arbitrary threat any different.
publicola1990超过 4 年前
The issue again is that seems an opaque action based on vague &quot;national security&quot; grounds. It certainly behoves the executive to demonstrate justification for actions before they are done.<p>The proper thing would be to define due transparent process for determining legality of apps&#x2F;services and subject all apps to the same set of rules.<p>Executive in general shout not be acting like a dictatorship.
izacus超过 4 年前
Huh, why is WPS Office included here? Last I&#x27;ve seen it, it was a pretty good mobile&#x2F;desktop office suite alterantive.
hoppla超过 4 年前
So, they must buy it from information brokers like everyone else?
russli1993超过 4 年前
With all this talk about China threating US national security. US actions is actively causing damages in china. Sanctions on Huawei for example is already resulting Huawei unable to build smartphones and other products. There are layoffs at huawei, all kind of suppliers, even sales people at huawei stores. If you count all the people related by Huawei&#x27;s activities, its millions. Normal people, regular folks, who just want to earn a living to support their families. Now all of sudden out of jobs during an pandemic year because of political action by US government. They may have bills and mortgages to pay, kids to feed. Real people are suffering because of the actions of US gov. Chinese people&#x27;s security is actually being damaged here. And where do these people go to protest for their rights and fight for what were theirs?
评论 #25657769 未加载
评论 #25657493 未加载
评论 #25657560 未加载
评论 #25657492 未加载
评论 #25660248 未加载
评论 #25659959 未加载
评论 #25657499 未加载
评论 #25660541 未加载
评论 #25657523 未加载
评论 #25657527 未加载
runawaybottle超过 4 年前
Trump is not educated enough on these matters to take the initiative. The intelligence apparatus is pushing for these, and will continue to do so with the Biden administration.<p>I can’t envision this Cold War ratcheting down. On the surface, Biden will wipe the slate clean on the trade war stuff, but the tit for tat stuff like this will accelerate.<p>I don’t know what the end result of it will be, but the movement on this front is almost like day trading for defense departments, there’s enough bullshit here to justify entire agencies and budgets (as in, Palantir is going to find some crap here to monetize).<p>Prediction - at least a few provisions in the near term stimulus bills, green deals, that will include funding for China containment policy.<p>Biden has been clear he doesn’t want China setting preconditions for companies (the precondition being we get to copy your IP), and the second bullying sovereign nations economically in it’s sphere of influence. I just don’t know what this will actually look like, but Biden&#x2F;Obama had way more of a master plan policy than Trump ever did for dealing with China:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;East_Asian_foreign_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;East_Asian_foreign_policy_of...</a>
评论 #25657042 未加载
swiley超过 4 年前
The problem isn&#x27;t Chinese software, it&#x27;s the smartphone model that makes consumers extremely susceptible to vendor lock-in and network effects for even trivial things like sharing files.
chad_strategic超过 4 年前
I can&#x27;t remember is Facebook and Twitter allowed in China?
评论 #25659443 未加载
jdalgetty超过 4 年前
Pretty disappointed about WPS Office. I find it&#x27;s quite good running on Ubuntu.
stuckindider超过 4 年前
&gt;Ambar, an influencer, say she has seen inappropriate content on TikTok<p>Hahahaha what is this??
hertzrat超过 4 年前
&gt; President Trump&#x27;s order says &quot;by accessing personal electronic devices such as smartphones, tablets, and computers, &lt;I removed a word&gt; connected software applications can access and capture vast swaths of information from users, including sensitive personally identifiable information and private information.
MrBuddyCasino超过 4 年前
After decades of exporting (and&#x2F;or stealing) western IP and most of our manufacturing base to China, at the expense of the working class and to the benefit of capitalists, Trump was first to stop the bleeding. He wasn&#x27;t particularly smart about it, and he should have built alliances, yet he went alone as usual.<p>With all major western internet platforms being already banned in China, Jack Ma having disappeared for weeks now after being critical of the CCP, there are still comments here why everyone can&#x27;t be nice to each other, and what harm were those Chinese apps causing. The opioid crisis has so far killed more Americans than WW2, and at least some of it is caused by the evaporation of blue-collar jobs. This is a direct consequence of certain economic policies. Say what you will about the CCP, but at least it cares about its people - because they are doing the polar opposite.
hmate9超过 4 年前
You can bet Beijing will retaliate and ban even more US companies.
评论 #25657044 未加载
评论 #25657640 未加载
评论 #25657143 未加载
评论 #25657046 未加载
aleister_777超过 4 年前
Trump can do all he wants, but empirical data shows that folks just ignore him without consequences so these apps won&#x27;t be banned any longer than Tiktok was shut down or Chinese companies were delisted from the NYSE.<p>That doesn&#x27;t mean he is wrong and China hasn&#x27;t infiltrated America at every level, but it&#x27;s a lost battle now that America will be rolling out the red carpet for the CCP.
评论 #25657030 未加载
评论 #25657237 未加载
papito超过 4 年前
After American intel <i>officially</i> claims it was Russia behind the SolarWinds hack, Trump lashes out at China. &quot;Lookit here!&quot;. Coincidence? Hey, I am just asking questions.
评论 #25657113 未加载
someperson超过 4 年前
Why can&#x27;t the App Store and Google Play add country-of-origin labeling for applications?<p>I&#x27;m against the US banning apps, but having a clear warning message detailing the risks around downloading apps Made in China (eg, history of widespread Chinese government-sanctioned economic espionage) seems reasonable and appropriate.
评论 #25657789 未加载
sthnblllII超过 4 年前
Wall Street is very concerned that the next occupy wall street will circumvent their payment processor blacklists and surveillance by using Chinese competitors that aren&#x27;t controlled by US financial interests.
评论 #25657094 未加载