TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

China CCP to Nationalize Jack Ma's Alibaba and Ant Group – Report

485 点作者 masonhensley超过 4 年前

34 条评论

xster超过 4 年前
Is it me or there&#x27;s some cognitive dissonance going on with the whole article discussing the ramifications of a nationalization without describing at all what sourced this &quot;news&quot; in the first place?<p>A cursory search seems to show this is a regurgitation on a sourceless Radio Free Asia article (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rfa.org&#x2F;english&#x2F;news&#x2F;china&#x2F;alibaba-probe-12252020170303.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rfa.org&#x2F;english&#x2F;news&#x2F;china&#x2F;alibaba-probe-1225202...</a>) from December?
评论 #25737579 未加载
评论 #25733522 未加载
评论 #25734113 未加载
评论 #25733303 未加载
rootsudo超过 4 年前
Wow. This, alongside Jack Ma being &quot;missing&quot;, is really curious.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;au.finance.yahoo.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;jack-ma-missing-232138645.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;au.finance.yahoo.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;jack-ma-missing-232138645....</a><p>Best, semi-legit source I can find, there&#x27;s other news postings, but from more tabloid and sources that aren&#x27;t as sincere as Yahoo Financial News.<p>Which, itself is curious, because CNBC spins it differently:<p>&quot;<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;01&#x2F;05&#x2F;alibaba-founder-jack-ma-is-laying-low-for-the-time-being-not-missing.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;01&#x2F;05&#x2F;alibaba-founder-jack-ma-is-l...</a>&quot;<p>Which also falls under the AU-CN struggle, but also curious about how CNBC did not outright say he&#x27;s missing yet.<p>And technically, both could be correct, imprisoned means missing from society but not exactly &quot;missing&quot; in terms of knowing general wherebouts.
评论 #25733130 未加载
评论 #25735204 未加载
orange_tee超过 4 年前
The West thought once China is full of billionaires, the billionaires having all that wealth would then have the power to oppose and dissolve the CCP. Didn&#x27;t go as planned.
评论 #25733947 未加载
评论 #25734288 未加载
评论 #25734333 未加载
评论 #25734165 未加载
评论 #25745289 未加载
评论 #25733943 未加载
评论 #25758788 未加载
评论 #25734034 未加载
评论 #25735389 未加载
评论 #25734013 未加载
评论 #25733707 未加载
f00zz超过 4 年前
Article looks fishy. But if China goes down this route, it looks like fears of China economically overtaking the US are overblown.
评论 #25735230 未加载
评论 #25735670 未加载
评论 #25735214 未加载
评论 #25735269 未加载
评论 #25734541 未加载
xyzelement超过 4 年前
I was thinking about nationalization separately from this. The west has invested a lot into the Chinese economy hoping to translate the corresponding equity into growth. I wonder if the Chinese are really long term interested in honoring the equity.<p>Meaning - take the money now, grow the businesses and the economy and then at some point say &quot;It&#x27;s stupid that we&#x27;re letting foreigners have 20% (or whatever) ownership of our economy&quot; and just deem it illegal &#x2F; confiscate that equity.<p>Obviously it will prevent future foreign investment but if China is in a place where they don&#x27;t care about that, it would be the move.
评论 #25733429 未加载
评论 #25733676 未加载
评论 #25733392 未加载
评论 #25733482 未加载
评论 #25733647 未加载
评论 #25735511 未加载
评论 #25741008 未加载
评论 #25733319 未加载
karmasimida超过 4 年前
Except for the title, I don&#x27;t think this article substantiate what it addresses as nationalization.
hungryhobo超过 4 年前
Honestly can we not post stuff from radio free Asia on hacker News, this isn&#x27;t Reddit
评论 #25735419 未加载
SZJX超过 4 年前
Simply sad to see such a garbage-quality piece of fear-mongering &quot;journalism&quot; (published more than 2 weeks ago, no less), with only wild anti-CCP speculations from a single random commentator for Radio Free Asia (spoiler: not exactly known for their neutrality), and practically non-existent factual information, getting so many upvotes here. If one applies the least bit of logic, one could immediately grasp the absurdity of such a &quot;proposal&quot;, which would only do every party involved immense harm.<p>Then again, maybe this is no longer anything surprising at all, given the multiple recent precedents, including e.g. the ridiculous &quot;chromeisbad.com&quot; post.
gher-shyu3i超过 4 年前
Does that mean that they will be kicked out of the US stock market? They should.
liuliu超过 4 年前
This is a serious misunderstanding of what the means and ways at CCP&#x27;s disposal. Nationalization or taking controlling share of a company is a very Western view and would not happen to Baba. I wrote a few days ago about what would likely to happen to Baba: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;drz.today&#x2F;2020&#x2F;baba-is-not-the-next-khodorkovsky&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;drz.today&#x2F;2020&#x2F;baba-is-not-the-next-khodorkovsky&#x2F;</a>. Only time would tell of course.
dgellow超过 4 年前
Quite hard to believe. Does someone have a source for this report?
评论 #25733227 未加载
boringg超过 4 年前
Great timing to do this if you are the CCP - the world is focused on the US right now not much oxygen for anything else in the news cycle. I think the CCP&#x27;s true colors have been showing up a lot recently. I feel badly for the Chinese population as a whole as the rest of the globe finds it difficult to disentangle the two, and that the CCP applies pressure on foreign nationals (see: Australia).
philipov超过 4 年前
Something about how the images and their captions have nothing to do with the topic of the article seems very suspicious.
guhcampos超过 4 年前
This is a highly speculative article with vast, global, implications.<p>People should be taking this with Kilograms of salt.<p>Food for thought: if this was to be true we would be seeing several bit coin whale operations going on from insiders, and this isn&#x27;t the case even with the substantial drops in bitcoin value in the last 24 hours.
ogre_codes超过 4 年前
Wow.. this is like a giant gift to Amazon.<p>Obviously they aren&#x27;t getting more Chinese business, but they&#x27;ve struggled there already. But it makes it a lot easier for them to compete everywhere else. Competing against CCP is going to be a lot easier than competing against Jack Ma.
评论 #25736078 未加载
adam_ellsworth超过 4 年前
Excuse my ignorance here, but is the <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ant.design&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ant.design&#x2F;</a> suite of React UI&#x2F;UX components owned&#x2F;operated by the Ant Group mentioned in the article?
JumpCrisscross超过 4 年前
Not sure if someone in the party saw something wanted and created the groundwork to yank it. Or if this is genuinely punitive.<p>Either way, a standard if frequently-forgotten message to innovators in such regimes.
PeterStuer超过 4 年前
In China the government silences the enterprises if they run out of step, in the US the enterprises silence the governments if they run out of step.
nowherebeen超过 4 年前
I wonder how SoftBank will take this news.
xwdv超过 4 年前
Will the Ant design framework for React be compromised because of this? Would you still use it?
29athrowaway超过 4 年前
If Jack Ma is still alive, he must be enjoying the blessing of 996 somewhere.
评论 #25734321 未加载
didip超过 4 年前
Now this... is real totalitarianism.
trhway超过 4 年前
it may happen not necessarily as straight &quot;nationalization&quot;, instead the CCP&#x2F;government would just buy a controlling interest at a very sweet non-cash price what Ma and other shareholders would be more than happy to sell at ... given the alternatives.
martin1975超过 4 年前
This is scary. Thank you for posting things - I&#x27;ve reshared it to as many places as I can.
ddmma超过 4 年前
that concludes the story of the 40s thieves in the Alibaba case
nashashmi超过 4 年前
In a different time with a hardline conservative government we would see moves being drawn in the sand to prevent this kind of power domination by China. But neither Biden nor Trump have any incentive in drawing boundaries on CCP.<p>I never thought I’d wish for bigger hawks in the white house.
idrios超过 4 年前
The CCP is caught in its own version of purgatory through paranoia. When the great famine happened under Mao, it was because Mao had surrounded himself by yes-men who were competing to be the most loyal. When the famine hit, the provinces all reported better yields than actual, collectivism happened based on reported and not actual yield, and millions of farmers starved.<p>His successor, Deng Xiaoping started a lot of really great reforms, including term limits on leadership and granting Shenzhen &amp; some other cities special&#x2F;experimental economic status, to basically run autonomously as capitalist.<p>Several decades later, paranoia is too strong. Xi Jinping removed term limits because he doesn&#x27;t trust others to run the country better than him. The One China policy has killed a number of vibrant cultures including those of Tibet, Hong Kong, and the Uyghurs. A social credit system is being implemented. Now Alibaba is being nationalized.<p>These issues will likely only get worse, until another great famine event.
skyde超过 4 年前
isnt jack ma still reported missing ?
metabagel超过 4 年前
China previously required Alibaba and other companies to accept government officials within their companies.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ft.com&#x2F;content&#x2F;055a1864-ddd3-11e9-b112-9624ec9edc59" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ft.com&#x2F;content&#x2F;055a1864-ddd3-11e9-b112-9624ec9ed...</a><p>Fraser Howie, author of &quot;Red Capitalism&quot;, says that all Chinese corporations are either state owned enterprises or state overseen enterprises. It appears China may want to transition Alibaba from the latter to the former.
评论 #25733410 未加载
impalallama超过 4 年前
This is the most overtly communist thing China has done in a while.
f430超过 4 年前
Guo Wengui said back in September 2019 that &quot;Jack Ma would be jailed or killed&quot; on Kyle Bass&#x27;s youtube channel. [1]<p>At this point its not even a question of whether we will see Jack Ma in public again. Overnight he went from billionaire to peasantry. We&#x27;ve seen dozen cases like this:<p>1) Billionaire disappears or is &quot;killed&quot;<p>2) Billionaire&#x27;s company becomes nationalized<p>3) Rinse &amp; Repeat<p>Everybody who isn&#x27;t familiar with the inner workings of the CCP thinks that Jack Ma openly challenged the CCP. That simply isn&#x27;t the case. They are using as an excuse to take over the company because they <i>can</i>.<p>As much as people in the West praise CCP&#x27;s economic rise, and some even point to its authoritarian system as superior to our democracy, but little do they know the very laws that protect them isn&#x27;t an option in China.<p>Imagine spending most of your life building a massive business and then one day it is taken from you by force by an authoritarian ruler.<p>This is why anyone that has money send their kids abroad and move permanently to a Western country that their kids despise and criticize their host for calling out the CCP.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=YtJK_5qDraM" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=YtJK_5qDraM</a>
评论 #25735410 未加载
评论 #25735801 未加载
评论 #25734963 未加载
评论 #25736191 未加载
评论 #25735375 未加载
评论 #25735513 未加载
评论 #25735068 未加载
评论 #25736132 未加载
评论 #25735680 未加载
评论 #25735246 未加载
评论 #25736664 未加载
评论 #25736309 未加载
评论 #25736831 未加载
评论 #25736053 未加载
评论 #25734930 未加载
评论 #25737539 未加载
评论 #25735775 未加载
评论 #25734621 未加载
评论 #25735359 未加载
评论 #25735295 未加载
ketamine__超过 4 年前
What is Jack Ma&#x27;s projected net worth after nationalization? Do investors get a buyout?
评论 #25737612 未加载
baybal2超过 4 年前
10 years ago, nobody would&#x27;ve believed me if I were to say China will slide back into mass nationalisation, let alone nationalising something like an Internet company.<p>The real hardcore bolshevik style communists have clawed their way back into power.<p>They are back. I&#x27;m very well convinced now that Chinese nouveaux riche class, and foreign capital in China are living on a leased time.<p>The country is on its way back to seventies, irreversably now.
nabla9超过 4 年前
China is Unitary Marxist–Leninist one-party socialist republic. Communists are actually communists.<p>This is what is eventually supposed to happen every Chinese company according to the Chinese Communist party. They just allow private ownership, &quot;for now&quot;.