TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Economic Failures of the IPCC Process

42 点作者 szeptik超过 4 年前

3 条评论

hwillis超过 4 年前
&gt; In a subsequent paper, Nordhaus claimed that even a 6°C increase would only reduce global income by only 7.9%, compared to what it would be in the complete absence of global warming.<p>&gt; A critical feature of human physiology is our ability to dissipate internal heat by perspiration. This becomes impossible when the combination of heat and humidity, known as the “wet bulb temperature”, exceeds 35°C. Above this level, we are unable to dissipate the heat generated by our bodies, and the accumulated heat will kill a healthy individual within three hours. Scientists have estimated that a 5.5°C increase would mean that even New York would experience 55 days per year when the combination of temperature and humidity would be deadly (Mora et al., 2017, Figure 4, p. 504).<p>Honestly, that should be enough to sell the message on its own.
wombatmobile超过 4 年前
Regardless of the process, if the aim of the IPCC&#x27;s messaging is to change behaviour, its efforts are misdirected.<p>IPCC talks about the plight of the planet, by describing opaque physics and biodynamics processes, as if ordinary people will join the dots, make quantitative scientific appraisals, and selflessly decide to make sacrifices to save the planet.<p>Most people don&#x27;t think about the whole planet, or thermodynamics, or the future of humanity. They think about their hip pockets, themselves, and raising kids on a budget.<p>Renewables are cheaper!<p>Save money heating and cooling your house with solar energy!<p>Drive an electric car and save money on fuel and services!<p>Those are the messages IPCC should be putting out. Everybody loves a bargain. The promise of renewables, once we get over the develop and build cost humps, is infinite bargains. Sell that vista. It&#x27;s easier than selling science.
评论 #25744576 未加载
评论 #25743622 未加载
评论 #25743684 未加载
评论 #25747429 未加载
ncmncm超过 4 年前
My horizon for civilization collapse is &quot;probably not before 2030&quot;.<p>The most likely scenario I perceive is heavily populated tropical and subtropical areas becoming uninhabitable, initially via failure of subsistence farming, leading to mass migration, and rise of fascistic governments in temperate regions in reaction. Fascistic governments characteristically start wars. Wars in the presence of other fascistic governments spiral out of control, ending meaningful global commerce and triggering global economic collapse. Spiraling war tends toward thermonuclear exchange.<p>All this happens well <i>before</i>, e.g., significant ice sheet collapse, or climate-caused loss of temperate-zone agriculture.<p>Given global economic collapse, CO2 production might fall off as extraction and delivery are disrupted, but processes already begun would take long to wind down. Thus, ocean acidification might still collapse fisheries and eliminate major protein input for whole regional populations. Fisheries anyway depend on reliable fuel delivery.<p>We see hints of all of the above already, with massive migrations to Europe attempted from southerly countries where climate stresses have released forces that tend to civil war; and falling fishery yield. Numerous separate phenomena all produce waves of refugees, whether water stress, declining ag yield, or even migration from immediate neighbors that exceeds already stressed local carrying capacity.<p>Fascistic governments are gaining in all regions; the US&#x27;s step back must be counted as a blip, as very nearly half its population voted for continuation, and their elected representatives even tried to force the issue.<p>My question is not, how can we slow global climate disruption; it is, how can we prevent near-term global civilizational collapse? Collapse does not seem like the best way to reverse climate disruption, presuming it would even work.<p>If methane clathrates and permafrost carbon are released by (already well begun) local extremes of arctic warming, or loss of sea ice reduces albedo, falling industrial CO2 might not slow temperature rise or ocean acidification. Global nuclear fallout, &quot;nuclear winter&quot;, and vaporized industrial base would make any sort of recovery difficult and slow, over decades or even centuries.
评论 #25746824 未加载
评论 #25746804 未加载