TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Is Windows Server 2019 Serving Linux Containers Ready for Production?

9 点作者 portoal超过 4 年前
Windows Server 2019 Serving Windows Containers looks ready for Production,<p>but serving Linux Containers ? (through HyperV)<p>Our company only want Windows OS for Prod (not linux)<p>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.microsoft.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;virtualization&#x2F;windowscontainers&#x2F;quick-start&#x2F;set-up-environment?tabs=Windows-Server

6 条评论

SBArbeit超过 4 年前
Well, Microsoft Azure is one huge, global system, the second-largest cloud on Planet Earth, with millions of servers, almost all of which run Windows Server 2019 as the host OS, with even more millions of VM&#x27;s running on top, millions of which are Linux.<p>So, uh, yes, it&#x27;s ready for production.
评论 #25982828 未加载
core-questions超过 4 年前
&gt; Our company only want Windows OS for Prod (not linux)<p>This is a very strange decision. You pay a licensing cost to use Windows; the purpose of this is to be able to use Windows software and development tools. It&#x27;s not going to be in any way better than using Linux directly if the goal is to host Linux containers.<p>I would heavily question this, if I was in an environment where my employment was safe to do so.<p>Otherwise - who gives a shit if it&#x27;s &quot;ready for production&quot;? The decision has been made. Spend your employer&#x27;s money and if they have made a bad choice (and they have), it&#x27;s on them.
评论 #25982792 未加载
评论 #25982845 未加载
speedgoose超过 4 年前
If your company only wants windows for production, why would Linux containers be approved? Is it a tentative to circumvent the rule?
评论 #25982813 未加载
评论 #26004399 未加载
staticautomatic超过 4 年前
I’m in this same spot right now doing government contracting with only Windows server approved. On top of that open source software is only allowed if it’s “supported”. Between Anaconda Commercial and Windows, the universe of tooling is crazy small. All kinds of thing I’m used to are in this “runs on windows but isn’t officially supported and not a great choice for production” purgatory. I’m running flask through CGI on IIS. RQ&#x2F;Dramatiq&#x2F;Celery -&gt; SQL Server + sqlalchemy + APScheduler. Its...annoying. At least I have Pandas.
评论 #26004420 未加载
Spooky23超过 4 年前
A place I worked at a few years ago tried running HyperV for some use cases where it had licensing benefits. ~5000 VMs out of about 50000, mostly on VMWare.<p>At the time, the MS tooling was garbage, and we had a lot of operational networking issues. I would pay close attention to the tooling and the ops team capabilities.<p>If you need to use windows in prod, use Windows. Trying to get past a policy constraint with a hack like that ultimately isn’t a good idea for a variety of reasons. It’s not saving you money if the business breaks.
getcrunk超过 4 年前
Hyper v works to serve Linux vms. You should always test your particular use case before committing. They have trial licenses.
评论 #26004429 未加载