TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

‘Pro Tools proficiency’ may be keeping us from diversifying audio

3 点作者 kettunen超过 4 年前

1 comment

EADGBE超过 4 年前
<i>If there’s anybody out there who is requiring Pro Tools or anything else because it excludes a particular group disproportionately, that would be discriminatory</i><p>I think that’s a bit of a stretch. The core concepts of PT are available even in Pro Tools First (free). They’re requiring PT simply because it’s the industry standard in audio recording&#x2F;production. Though I agree with the author, the use of it in podcasting is perplexing.<p>If we’re going to go down this Avenue, the same parallels could be made for Adobe products and the gatekeeping they had, even before they went to a SaaS model.<p>It’s unfortunate that the industry requires PT proficiency, but it literally wrote the book on DAWs. Plenty of producers&#x2F;musicians use alternative software that’s cheaper or better equipped, but the PT pendulum has long swung; since they’re all using PT key mappings.