There are some mundane, and totally fine goals in here.<p>But midway through, there is some really broad and overreaching concepts.<p>When the goal is "No Unilateral Changes to Critical Software", this implies that there is "one" way to run an open source community. I'm not saying its a bad idea, its just that its weird for Google to "mandate" it just because a project is popular and therefore critical.<p>And then there is the big one, "Authentication for Participants in Critical Software" -- ie, you can't be anonymous to contribute to an open source project.