TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

New Rails PaaS coming. Rails Ready

7 点作者 joshfng将近 14 年前

5 条评论

jvoorhis将近 14 年前
Raw performance doesn't matter to me much as long as I can handle enough concurrent requests, and serve as few as possible with Rails (and trust me, I've built and maintained a webapp handling 50k+ concurrent connections). A good N-tier architecture goes a long way. You'll want a solid HTTP cache, an easy path towards integrating a CDN (better if you can resell and my IT dept has fewer vendors to worry about), and of course memcached is useful.<p>Creating an easy deployment process can be difficult but you'll find a good solution. No doubt you'll have a decent web management console as well. Devote some time as early as possible to the non-functional parts of the platform (fault-tolerance, availability, security, customer service and relationships) and you'll be in a good place.<p>Best of luck!
评论 #2619888 未加载
rmy将近 14 年前
Heroku deployment shell script is nice. Minus is that workers are too expensive -- you pay a full one even if you only use it rarely. Scaling solutions like SimpleWorker can't access their shared database, so you have to upgrade to a super expensive one or develop work-arounds.
railsready将近 14 年前
Not trying to start a hype machine. Please let us know what you do and do not like about the existing Rails hosting providers out there and the offerings they have. Your input is key :)
cincinnatus将近 14 年前
Performance. Whether that is through a better VM (Rubinious?), faster gear, whatever, your worry not mine.
railsready将近 14 年前
Ruby 1.9.2 has significant speed improvements over the 1.8 vm