TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

US raises ‘deep concerns’ over WHO report on Covid’s Wuhan origins

502 点作者 lazycrazyowl超过 4 年前

46 条评论

ttz超过 4 年前
First gen Chinese, grew up in NA. Have contact with relatives &quot;on the ground&quot;.<p>My own experience: Don&#x27;t ever trust the Chinese government on issues that could potentially involve the reputation of the party. Note that I&#x27;m not saying don&#x27;t trust what CCP says, ever (sometimes they actually do good things) - just not on issues that involve anything to do with how the world might perceive them.<p>Which is exactly what this issue is about.<p>That&#x27;s not to say we have <i>compelling</i> evidence that this was a lab virus, either. I think, for me, it&#x27;s a, &quot;we don&#x27;t know, but I wouldn&#x27;t be shocked at all if it was a lab virus&quot;.
评论 #26130007 未加载
评论 #26126998 未加载
评论 #26129021 未加载
评论 #26129539 未加载
评论 #26129838 未加载
评论 #26128615 未加载
评论 #26129928 未加载
评论 #26130219 未加载
评论 #26130094 未加载
评论 #26132091 未加载
评论 #26129888 未加载
评论 #26130820 未加载
评论 #26131175 未加载
评论 #26130976 未加载
评论 #26130846 未加载
评论 #26129279 未加载
评论 #26130059 未加载
评论 #26130128 未加载
评论 #26129977 未加载
评论 #26130276 未加载
评论 #26129643 未加载
评论 #26125946 未加载
评论 #26126178 未加载
评论 #26129706 未加载
评论 #26130279 未加载
评论 #26129695 未加载
评论 #26126380 未加载
评论 #26128609 未加载
评论 #26126324 未加载
评论 #26126897 未加载
tripletao超过 4 年前
I don&#x27;t know whether SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab. But if it did, then not only is it probably not the first lab-origin pandemic, but it&#x27;s also not the first time the WHO initially excluded that possibility.<p>The 1977 Russian Flu pandemic was genetically near-identical to a strain from 1950, without the expected mutations that should have appeared after 27 years of undetected circulation among humans or animals. It&#x27;s been widely suspected in mainstream literature to have escaped from a research or vaccine manufacturing accident, to the point that the NEJM casually wrote:<p>&gt; The reemergence was probably an accidental release from a laboratory source in the setting of waning population immunity to H1 and N1 antigens<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nejm.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;full&#x2F;10.1056&#x2F;NEJMra0904322" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nejm.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;full&#x2F;10.1056&#x2F;NEJMra0904322</a><p>But at the time, the WHO said:<p>&gt; Laboratory contamination can be excluded because the laboratories concerned either had never kept H1N1 virus or had not worked with it for a long time.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pmc&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC2395678&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;bullwho00443-0095.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pmc&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC2395678&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;bul...</a><p>And it&#x27;s absolutely bizarre to me that people are asking why the origin even matters. After thousands of people died in Bhopal, did it matter whether better chemical safety standards could have prevented that? So with millions dead now, how could you possibly not wonder whether our current standards for the sampling and manipulation of poorly-understood pandemic-candidate viruses are adequate?
评论 #26128687 未加载
评论 #26128657 未加载
mgamache超过 4 年前
Related: China refused to provide WHO team with raw data on early COVID cases,<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-health-coronavirus-who-china&#x2F;china-refused-to-provide-who-team-with-raw-data-on-early-covid-cases-team-member-says-idUSKBN2AD090" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-health-coronavirus-who-ch...</a>
评论 #26125728 未加载
评论 #26128624 未加载
评论 #26126286 未加载
mgamache超过 4 年前
If anyone is tempted to associate &#x27;lab leak&#x27; with xenophobia or anti-Chinese sentiment, please remember the WIV lab was in partnership with the U.S. NIH (National Institutes of Health).<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.biospace.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;1nih-awards-ecohealth-alliance-7-5-million-grant-despite-political-furor&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.biospace.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;1nih-awards-ecohealth-allia...</a>
评论 #26126210 未加载
评论 #26129757 未加载
评论 #26129901 未加载
评论 #26128602 未加载
esja超过 4 年前
I am yet to see a single piece of evidence which rules out the lab leak hypothesis. Meanwhile the circumstantial evidence in favour of that hypothesis (including China’s behaviour) continues to pile up. We may never discover the truth, but I really hope we do.
评论 #26128649 未加载
评论 #26126259 未加载
评论 #26127197 未加载
Fricken超过 4 年前
What&#x27;s weird is that a number of WHO investigation team members a week ago said China was very transparent, cooperative and helpful. Some have tweeted against the NYT who spun the WHO team&#x27;s accounts into anti-China propaganda.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;PeterDaszak&#x2F;status&#x2F;1360551108565999619" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;PeterDaszak&#x2F;status&#x2F;13605511085659...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;TheaKFischer&#x2F;status&#x2F;1360590441817772034" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;TheaKFischer&#x2F;status&#x2F;1360590441817...</a>
评论 #26128876 未加载
评论 #26128815 未加载
评论 #26127595 未加载
评论 #26128898 未加载
tebuevd超过 4 年前
&quot;Deep concerns&quot; over Navalny&#x27;s poisoning. &quot;Deep concerns&quot; over Navalny&#x27;s imprisonment. &quot;Deep concerns&quot; over the coup in Myanmar. And now &quot;deep concerns&quot; over China refusing to provide data to the WHO.
评论 #26129628 未加载
zug_zug超过 4 年前
Cool, glad both sides of the aisle are willing to consider all possible origins. It shouldn&#x27;t be a political statement to want the most accurate answer to a health-question, and maybe it won&#x27;t have to be anymore.
Leary超过 4 年前
People don&#x27;t realize that we are engaged in a great power competition with China. And the battle of information&#x2F;misinformation is everywhere. Don&#x27;t trust anything from the US&#x2F;China about the other, rely on neutral third parties instead
评论 #26149439 未加载
mc32超过 4 年前
Beside the danger of adding function to an infectious virus, the biggest danger is the complete politicization of the virus. The WHO has changed their tune back and forth, often vehemently with little to back up its position. In that light the US should consider withdrawing completely from this body.
评论 #26125749 未加载
评论 #26126049 未加载
评论 #26128375 未加载
评论 #26125622 未加载
评论 #26125733 未加载
评论 #26128710 未加载
rossdavidh超过 4 年前
So, perhaps there is a valid reason for China to refuse to give the raw data on early COVID-19 victims to the WHO, but I have to say, as a reader who&#x27;s never been particularly impressed by the possibility of it being lab-created, I have to say this is not a good look for China.
评论 #26126417 未加载
评论 #26128625 未加载
knolax超过 4 年前
It&#x27;s interesting that instead of posting the report itself, or even a detailed article that criticizes the report, the top article on HN is a bland summary of an accusation from a third party with no direct quotes or attribution. It&#x27;s basically a press release.<p>The only article that I can find that actually tries to levy complaints of obstruction is this one from the NYT[0]. However, several of the WHO investigators quoted have gone on Twitter accusing the NYT of twisting their words[1]. Makes me pretty doubtful that there was any obstruction.<p>On one side we have a country with half a million cases that has since December been accusing China with &quot;coverups&quot; without materializing much evidence, despite document leaks and now an international investigation. On the other side we have a country with orders of magnitude fewer total and per capita cases, whose case demographics have matched up with numbers from other countries, and whose export numbers in neighboring countries has also been consistent with their reported numbers. At this point if there was some sort of obstruction or coverup the Whitehouse would have a smoking gun by now.<p>Other comments here talking about the &quot;lab origin&quot; theory pretty much hinge on theological logic. &quot;Well it could come from a lab, and there&#x27;s no proof yet that it didn&#x27;t, so I have faith&quot;. It isn&#x27;t Bayesian reasoning if you don&#x27;t bring up rigorous statistics to prove your point.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;02&#x2F;12&#x2F;world&#x2F;asia&#x2F;china-world-health-organization-coronavirus.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;02&#x2F;12&#x2F;world&#x2F;asia&#x2F;china-world-he...</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.moonofalabama.org&#x2F;2021&#x2F;02&#x2F;caught-in-the-act-new-york-times-intentionally-misquotes-scientists-to-fit-its-prescribed-narrative.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.moonofalabama.org&#x2F;2021&#x2F;02&#x2F;caught-in-the-act-new-...</a>
bloomfilter超过 4 年前
Whether the virus came out of a lab or not, one thing is clear — we as a country can’t handle any pandemic. Till this day we still can’t get everyone wear a mask in public. (I have some people on FB working at tech industry with grad school education still think we should let the virus run its course, and mask is stupid)<p>Not to mention thousands of large social gatherings that happened way after the virus was already causing thousands of death.<p>If you can’t control other countries, maybe we should at least figure out how to improve our response?<p>What if some other virus comes out of nature next time when we have no one to blame?
berdario超过 4 年前
Reuters is twisting the truth. We should rather listen to the scientists who actually worked at the WHO.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;PeterDaszak&#x2F;status&#x2F;1360551108565999619" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;PeterDaszak&#x2F;status&#x2F;1360551108565999619</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;TheaKFischer&#x2F;status&#x2F;1360590441817772034" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;TheaKFischer&#x2F;status&#x2F;1360590441817772034</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;LiuXininBeijing&#x2F;status&#x2F;1360741600507269121" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;LiuXininBeijing&#x2F;status&#x2F;13607416005072691...</a><p>And people wonder why I complain about propaganda in the western world :&#x2F;
评论 #26131619 未加载
ggm超过 4 年前
Plausible is not evidence. Gain of function as I understand it leaves signs. If scientists say they don&#x27;t see the signs, that&#x27;s absence of evidence.<p>On the other hand zoonotic disease is known to exist.<p>Please do not allow dislike of a state party system to pollute your thinking. Your views about China do not inform what happened and in the end, this becomes repetitive.<p>I might add that I dislike many things about other economies just as much. I too indulge these &quot;they musta dunnit&quot; fantasies. But, I wake up to myself: wasting too much time on motive and belief is not helpful.<p>There is no strong evidence of lab caused leakage. The WHO scientists are competent. WHO politics are ugly, all UN politics are ugly. Read the science.
评论 #26132217 未加载
endisneigh超过 4 年前
Forgive my ignorance but even if it was lab created, so what? I don’t really understand why it matters or not. Didn’t the entire world basically have a nearly 3 month heads up on this either way?
评论 #26125847 未加载
评论 #26125903 未加载
评论 #26125866 未加载
评论 #26125888 未加载
评论 #26125965 未加载
评论 #26132148 未加载
评论 #26127172 未加载
评论 #26126108 未加载
评论 #26126114 未加载
评论 #26126186 未加载
dm319超过 4 年前
This is worth a read:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;s41591-020-0820-9" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;s41591-020-0820-9</a>
评论 #26125660 未加载
评论 #26125674 未加载
评论 #26125649 未加载
hereforphone超过 4 年前
&quot;Deep concerns&quot; don&#x27;t change anything.
评论 #26129475 未加载
jchook超过 4 年前
Related: Scientists found SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in US blood samples taken from December 2019 to January 2020<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;academic.oup.com&#x2F;cid&#x2F;advance-article&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.1093&#x2F;cid&#x2F;ciaa1785&#x2F;6012472" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;academic.oup.com&#x2F;cid&#x2F;advance-article&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.1093&#x2F;cid...</a><p>Edit: removed incorrect conclusion
评论 #26125966 未加载
评论 #26126020 未加载
xnfra超过 4 年前
I just wish everyone deals with this whole situation with absolute objectivity instead of hyperbole. Speculation and trust is important but please don&#x27;t input your own subjective perspective into assumptions.
prof-dr-ir超过 4 年前
I, for one, would be interested in reading the <i>actual report</i> before deciding on whether to share any concerns about it.<p>Unfortunately this is not yet possible because, well, the WHO scientists are still working on it.
WarOnPrivacy超过 4 年前
I will know whether or not China engineered this virus when I read compelling, trustworthy evidence to that end.
Sparkyte超过 4 年前
I don&#x27;t know but the racism against Asian Americans needs to stop as majority of are not immigrants. Not just the immigrant complaint but not everyone Asian is Chinese. An elderly Thai man was brutally murdered by a couple racist kids, one ironically named Malaysia.
amelius超过 4 年前
Why isn&#x27;t there some regulation in place that says that any man-made virus should contain some specific sequence of junk dna so that we can at least trace it as such?
评论 #26132014 未加载
jpswade超过 4 年前
It’s an interesting theory, I’d question what’s their end game here? What’s the motive?
yawaworht1978超过 4 年前
Lol this is why programmers should stick to programming.
robomartin超过 4 年前
&gt; echoing concerns raised by the administration of former President Donald Trump, who also moved to quit the WHO over the issue<p>This is what gets me in politics: For all the well-deserved vilification Trump was subjected to, it seems that every day we are discovering some of the important policies and opinions they issued were right on point. The dichotomy, it seems, is one of vilification due to his often insolent and down-right ignorant public style and presence rather than anything I would characterize as substantive.<p>I have worked with people like that. People with sometimes deep personality and social issues who do great work and excel professionally. To take it in another direction, back when I was actively mentoring high school FRC teams we got all kinds of kids. There were kids on the Autism spectrum as well as Asperger&#x27;s. I can say that every single one of them was superb in their team participation once I learned how to work with them and, above all, accept that they didn&#x27;t sound or behave like the rest.<p>I am not making a parallel between Trump and these conditions. Just saying that it is sometimes important to focus on substance rather than theater.<p>Case in point:<p>I just got my second COVID vaccine yesterday. Shaking and feeling like crap as I type this (it will last a few hours).<p>When Trump said vaccines were coming by the end of the year everyone laughed at him. It was brutal. I remember watching CNN as they tore him to pieces for daring to &quot;not use science&quot; and raising our hopes in such ignorant ways.<p>Well, we are currently vaccinating at a rate of approximately 1.5 million people per day and this will go up.<p>Did Biden do this? Look, I am in manufacturing. Have been my entire life. You don&#x27;t produce 1.5 million per day of anything, distribute and administer it with some sort of a &quot;then a miracle occurs&quot; approach. Biden has only been in office a few days. There is absolutely no way he could have any material impact on vaccine delivery and administration during that time. These things have to be planned and well-executed for months. Which means I got my vaccine (and 1.5 million people are getting their vaccines) because of the organization and planning the Trump administration created and drove, likely back to March&#x2F;April of last year. I&#x27;d be interested in hearing from anyone --WITH MANUFACTURING EXPERIENCE-- who thinks you can instantly go from 100K per day to 1.5 million per day just because there&#x27;s a new boss in town. I mean, remember that we couldn&#x27;t even produce masks and PPE at scale in this country (or nearly any other country). In this sense this should have been a massive wakeup call to the world, not just the US.<p>This means that Biden&#x27;s &quot;100 million in 100 days&quot; will be achieved and exceeded --by Trump-- so long as people go get vaccinated. And, without a doubt, Biden will take credit for 100% of it. This is what I hate about politics.<p>There are other issues for which he was vilified that will turn out to have been right non point. I won&#x27;t dive into the details here. Some of these include:<p>- The Paris climate accord (seriously, google the document, read it and tell me how it will save the world...it&#x27;s nonsense...expensive nonsense)<p>- Tariffs on steel and aluminum. I am doing an aircraft design project right now. I can buy US-made aluminum for roughly 25% less than the cost of steel. That has never been the case in my life. Of course, everyone in the metals industry wants Biden to keep the tariffs in place. May I remind you Trump was called &quot;racist&quot; and all kinds of other things for enacting this?<p>- The pipeline. Aside from the fact that tens of thousands of jobs will be lost (a good friend of mine lost his and is facing having to sell his house to survive). Everything around you requires oil. It doesn&#x27;t matter if it is made from plastics or not. You don&#x27;t think aluminum and steel require oil for manufacturing and more? Do some research. The US achieved net exporter status during Trump&#x27;s years. That will surely go away. Also, cost of goods (not just gasoline) was kept under check because we controlled oil. Not any more. A friend in Arizona tells me gasoline prices have doubled there. I regularly ship large aerospace components in the thousands of pounds. Freight prices are being impacted by this (my opinion) stupid move. Yes, we all want everything clean. However, there&#x27;s a fine line between wishing something and being delusional about how and when it can be achieved.<p>Anyhow, I&#x27;ll stop here. There&#x27;s more, but I need to go to the couch and shake-off the vaccine side effects for a few hours. If you disagree with the above, be honest enough to do the research before forming an opinion. Above all, if you do not have operational experience running a business, you need to understand that you are not equipped to understand the many dynamics at play here.<p>Simple example: If gas prices explode companies are going to have to raise pay for their workers. Sounds good until you understand at least two things. First, the worker doesn&#x27;t get to use that raise, it goes towards paying for oil. Second, that money could have been used to hire more people and create jobs. In fact, higher oil prices could destroy jobs in areas one might not suspect.<p>No, everyone isn&#x27;t going to go buy electric cars and trucks. Get over it. This will take a long time. The infrastructure isn&#x27;t ready.<p>FYI: Fixing climate change by 2030&#x2F;2050&#x2F;2100? Delusional. We can&#x27;t do it. And yet we are going to burn resources promoting pure bullshit instead of talking about how to adapt.<p>Politics sucks. I want honest exchange of ideas judged by their merit, not through a political lens.
throwitaway1235超过 4 年前
What are we to make of the National Cancer Institute study that found Covid-19 in Italy as early as September 2019?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;health-coronavirus-italy-timing&#x2F;researchers-find-coronavirus-was-circulating-in-italy-earlier-than-thought-idUSKBN27W1J2" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;health-coronavirus-italy-tim...</a>
评论 #26128907 未加载
steve76超过 4 年前
Today is Valentines Day. And a Sunday. Living in the USA, I have the luxury to acknowledge Christ, and love. Faith is doing what Adam could not do. Whether good things happen or not, humanity will always find paradise by limiting the violence and not creating it. From there arrives hope, knowing you found paradise while others are not. Their actions are not yours, and you wish them the best. Both annihilate the self, replacing it with paradise. Both require effort. Greater than both is love, not license, or the soft New Age. What&#x27;s seen in nature, in Renaissance masters. Overwhelming power that dwarfs people, melting away one&#x27;s faults with cherishment by someone else who&#x27;s better in every way. No mysticism required with humanistic religion. Something more powerful lets me live. We exist because of forgiveness. That&#x27;s good enough.<p>Authoritarians, their unchecked ambition, unrestrained by laws replace life with nothing. To them, a place with plagues and murder is a good place. Billions of people are something to be processed, to be mined for hollow celebrity and ambitious license unrestrained by laws. A genetic weapon released from a communist military lab??? Everyone is very lucky they&#x27;re still breathing. This could have easily killed the world. And for what? A 1% margin on soy bean prices? Americans, people we trusted with power and money rushed to defend their precious marxism like some teenage girl catfished by jihadis in 2014.<p>Since everyone gets to what they want, I&#x27;m going to emit a matter wave into the center of the sun. The sub orbits a black hole. I make it so the surface of that black hole is a faster, easier path than completing an orbit around it. I expand that to the surface of the Earth for gravity applications, coherent control of pair production. All observable celestial bodies are thermal effects of what&#x27;s here on Earth.<p>It&#x27;s one thing to mine an asteroid with fuel cells and drones. It&#x27;s another thing to microwave it out of the sky, as if I command the weather around us, the clouds above, and even the great heavenly bodies themselves!!!
renewiltord超过 4 年前
The WHO is a useless organization. For political reasons, it will be necessary to engage, but hopefully US authorities will not treat it as an information source.<p>The US should use its own primary sources in future to evaluate disease spread. China <i>will</i> lie to the WHO and the WHO <i>will</i> protect it.<p>But to know the truth, we should use our modern equivalents of Key Hole. There is no truth but that which you have examined yourself.
评论 #26125954 未加载
评论 #26125868 未加载
评论 #26126311 未加载
评论 #26125877 未加载
评论 #26125924 未加载
评论 #26126024 未加载
评论 #26125688 未加载
评论 #26125790 未加载
评论 #26125833 未加载
count_chockula超过 4 年前
First: Calling the virus Chinese is racist. Second: Trump is now gone. Now: The virus might have come from a lab in China. Summary: Playing politics harms all.
f430超过 4 年前
If the CCP have nothing to hide then why do they do everything they possibly can to hide things from the rest of the world?
评论 #26125764 未加载
评论 #26126334 未加载
评论 #26125957 未加载
throwawaysea超过 4 年前
From <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;d41586-021-00375-7" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;d41586-021-00375-7</a><p>&gt; Dwyer says that the team didn’t see anything during its visits to suggest a lab accident. “Now, whether we were shown everything? You can never know. The group wasn’t designed to go and do a forensic examination of lab practice.”<p>From <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;01&#x2F;13&#x2F;world&#x2F;asia&#x2F;china-who-wuhan-covid.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;01&#x2F;13&#x2F;world&#x2F;asia&#x2F;china-who-wuha...</a><p>&gt; Even in the best of circumstances, a full inquiry could take months, if not longer. The team must also navigate attempts by China to politicize the inquiry.<p>And yet a few days ago the WHO pushed out a hasty judgment that it was very unlikely the virus leaked from the lab. And in the last day they’ve already started backtracking after intense skepticism from the world - see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2021-02-12&#x2F;who-backs-away-from-outright-rejection-of-virus-lab-leak-theory" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2021-02-12&#x2F;who-backs...</a> titled “ WHO Backs Away From Outright Rejection of Virus Lab-Leak Theory”.<p>It also seems that now the virus may have been reported even earlier than we thought. From <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;02&#x2F;12&#x2F;world&#x2F;asia&#x2F;china-world-health-organization-coronavirus.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;02&#x2F;12&#x2F;world&#x2F;asia&#x2F;china-world-he...</a>:<p>&gt; The Chinese scientists also acknowledged they had discovered that 92 people were hospitalized in Wuhan as early as October 2019 with symptoms such as fever and coughing. The Chinese experts said they had found no trace of Covid-19 in those people, but the tests were incomplete. The W.H.O. team members said more research was needed.<p>Between the CCP’s early suppression of journalism and social media reporting on the virus, the fact that Taiwan was the first to warn the world, China’s repeated denials and delays in letting an outside team to visit the site, and their purge of all the coronavirus studies originating from this lab (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.the-sun.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;2113876&#x2F;covid-cover-up-china-wuhan-studies-batwoman-virologist&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.the-sun.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;2113876&#x2F;covid-cover-up-china-wu...</a>), there is very little reason to trust the claim that a lab leak can be ruled out. If anything it only seems more likely that a massive coverup is in progress, and the WHO is the willing mouthpiece for it.
blackrock超过 4 年前
So which is it?<p>That the Chinese eat bats? Or that this was a lab leak?<p>Because it obviously cannot be both!<p>But yet, all the racist white people of the world, and yes, they were all white people, were accusing the Chinese of being disgusting and eating bats.<p>The western world claims that they are multicultural, and not racist, but yet, this one thing caused them to show their true racist colors.<p>Surprisingly, no normal white people, came to the defense and shouted down the racists among them. Thus validating the fact, that their silence meant that they supported all the racist vitriol that came out from their fellow brethren.<p>The truth hurts. I know. I expect that my comment will be flagged and censored.
howtofly超过 4 年前
Now we&#x27;re busy celebrating Chinese New Year and the victory of the fight over COVID-19, who care about US concerns :)
elchief超过 4 年前
Where was the NSA in all this? Shouldn&#x27;t they have all communications, traffic data, location data on everyone in Wuhan?
anovikov超过 4 年前
These people will never change. Wasn&#x27;t Yalta conference or Cuban missile crisis sufficient to understand that one should never trust Commies?
diogenescynic超过 4 年前
WHO can’t even say Taiwan, so I’m not going to trust anything they say related to China.
gfodor超过 4 年前
If this wasn’t from the lab, or a bad actor set it up to look like it was, to me it’s enough of a coincidence to basically conclude we live in a simulation.
评论 #26128725 未加载
coldtea超过 4 年前
Isn&#x27;t it well established by now that Covid-19 was present in samples taken in Europe and elsewhere way before Wuhan incidents?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-health-coronavirus-spain-science-idUSKBN23X2HQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-health-coronavirus-spain-...</a>
评论 #26129429 未加载
评论 #26129368 未加载
underseacables超过 4 年前
It will take generations before China will recover from the Wuhan virus outbreak. However it happened, because of the CCP suppressing facts, people, and information, the harm to any credibility the Chinese government had is gone for some time. This could have been the China century, but for generations there will always be that doubt.
评论 #26126362 未加载
jjd33超过 4 年前
US also praises Saudi and Israeli rule of law and democratic institutions.<p>North Korea seems a more trustworthy source of news than US nowdays.
sgt101超过 4 年前
We <i>know</i> that China made a mess of the first phase of the pandemic. There was a huge new years party in Wuhan and an uncontrolled outbreak. That was in the news at the time, but someone then put the story about a lab excursion out which is probably untrue and this has been a key focus of discussions since.<p>To me this is like a magician distracting the audiences attention from the gold penny - you are all looking in the wrong place while the real issue is being forgotten.
bluepirate超过 4 年前
Um I shared analysis 15 days ago from a doctor who did an in-depth analysis and determined it to be from a lab. My post got one comment. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=25965751" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=25965751</a>
评论 #26129558 未加载
评论 #26128854 未加载
评论 #26128635 未加载
sjg007超过 4 年前
If it was lab created independent scientists would be able to figure it out and there would be evidence that it was. But it looks like there is not:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;s41591-020-0820-9" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;s41591-020-0820-9</a><p>Now maybe the virus mutated from those initial 174 cases but that&#x27;s unlikely.<p>China does have a narrative that covid19 reinfections are coming from imported frozen foods though so I&#x27;m not sure why they are pushing that angle. It&#x27;s probably an economic one and to save face. But maybe it&#x27;s real.. if it is we are screwed.
评论 #26126040 未加载
评论 #26125991 未加载
foolmeonce超过 4 年前
I think the WHO did a fine job of writing it up. The US motive for proving China is at fault is largely political diversion from the US&#x27; mishandling, which would be mishandling no matter what origin.<p>That China blocked the Who&#x27;s efforts and the WHO disclosed this is more relevant to future health policy than where this particular outbreak started. (Do we really want the public health system to tune to this specific scenario?)
评论 #26126330 未加载