TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Roaring Kitty to testify on GameStop alongside hedge fund managers

172 点作者 IamZeroBalance超过 4 年前

17 条评论

sillysaurusx超过 4 年前
It&#x27;s interesting watching &#x2F;r&#x2F;wallstreetbets oscillate between &quot;We did nothing wrong!&quot; to &quot;Well okay, some people were doing some things that were wrong, but hopefully no one will notice.&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;wallstreetbets&#x2F;comments&#x2F;lj8djx&#x2F;day_1_of_gamestop_hearing_house_committee_on&#x2F;gnbatfl&#x2F;?context=2" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;wallstreetbets&#x2F;comments&#x2F;lj8djx&#x2F;day_...</a><p>(I don&#x27;t personally believe that anyone did anything that should be prosecuted here, but what I believe is irrelevant to courts.)<p>There is one thing that (in my un-humble, ignorant opinion) should be prosecuted: according to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=4RS4JIEVyXM&amp;ab_channel=Benzinga" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=4RS4JIEVyXM&amp;ab_channel=Benzi...</a> the reason that trades were suspended is that the clearinghouse changed their requirements from 3% to 100% for GameStop specifically. And that clearinghouse settles 95% of all trades on Wall Street, so they effectively have a monopoly. Therefore that&#x27;s why all the exchanges <i>had</i> to suspend GME training; no one had 100% collateral to cover GME for 3 days.<p>Everything else -- Gill getting rich, WSB posts, Citadel&#x27;s bailout of Melvin, etc -- is just a distraction. I hope one day they bring that clearinghouse to heel, since it was seriously uncool for them to change the rules of the game with the justification of &quot;we said so.&quot;
评论 #26130676 未加载
评论 #26131800 未加载
评论 #26130609 未加载
评论 #26130683 未加载
评论 #26130630 未加载
评论 #26135815 未加载
评论 #26130921 未加载
评论 #26131722 未加载
评论 #26134506 未加载
评论 #26131351 未加载
评论 #26133820 未加载
评论 #26133049 未加载
tape_measure超过 4 年前
RoaringKitty is also known as DeepFuckingValue. This name is probably more well known to the general public, but Reuters does not mention it.
评论 #26130635 未加载
评论 #26130801 未加载
mouzogu超过 4 年前
What about Musk making tweets about bitcoin whilst his company has a large investment. Isn&#x27;t that market manipulation or maybe does not apply to rogue billionaires.
评论 #26130885 未加载
评论 #26131222 未加载
评论 #26130780 未加载
评论 #26133869 未加载
评论 #26133027 未加载
评论 #26130772 未加载
评论 #26130961 未加载
Hnrobert42超过 4 年前
Can you imagine being called to testify before Congress and the news citing the username you chose at 2am when all the other usernames were taken? “Next they’ll the calling to the floor Preston Claghorn, also known as analmudflaps247.”
BLKNSLVR超过 4 年前
Is this investigating Robinhood&#x27;s halting of trade? That&#x27;s mentioned towards the end of the very short article, but nowhere does it explicitly specify what is being investigated and why.<p>The article says this: &quot;The House Financial Services Committee is examining how an apparent flood of retail trading drove GameStop and other shares to extreme highs, squeezing hedge funds like Melvin Capital that had bet against it.&quot;<p>Which is a sentence that answers it&#x27;s own question.<p>The political ripples of this will be very interesting to watch.
评论 #26131242 未加载
pjc50超过 4 年前
This is not a prosecution, just an investigation. The one he should be more worried about is:<p>&gt; Massachusetts securities regulators have also issued a subpoena seeking Gill’s testimony.
stereolambda超过 4 年前
Older RoaringKitty YT spreadsheet videos (before he became all about GME and before much of anyone watched his streams) are interesting to watch for a person casually interested in finance. They are very nerdy in discussing his approach to investing, tools etc. and don&#x27;t present any clear recipes. He had&#x2F;probably still has a biggish public portfolio of stocks and seemed to base it on financial analysis applying the value investing style. I thought this style is pretty much dead, because market efficiency has increased compared to the times when Benjamin Graham analysed securities by hand. (Unless you have the name recognition and capital of Buffett.)<p>I don&#x27;t know if all this was completely sincere on RoaringKitty&#x27;s part. Personally I believe that he mostly was at that time. Possibly he got carried away by money and fame later. But I 1) don&#x27;t have to decide it for any official body 2) was never long GME, it was already too expensive (risky) compared to fundamentals when I learned of the story. What I&#x27;m trying to say is: fraudsters tend to want to sell you something, and at least it seemed that you weren&#x27;t sold anything by RK.<p>I can get recommendations on in-depth (practical), interesting, non-pushy financial content for casual viewer. Please don&#x27;t say Matt Levine, he&#x27;s a (great) commentator not a practitioner.<p>Also, I think everyone interested is aware that <i>no one should expect money from active investing</i>, you should use something like index funds first while already having a comfortable amount of money in safer assets etc. That&#x27;s why I say casually.
评论 #26133887 未加载
评论 #26131805 未加载
评论 #26131137 未加载
评论 #26132852 未加载
codecamper超过 4 年前
The elephant in the room that I don&#x27;t see much discussion about is the use of options by small retail accounts.<p>There are piles of rules around trading in accounts &lt; $25,000.<p>But then those same guys are allowed to trade options.<p>An option has a 100x built in leverage.<p>A simple solution to this problem is to require the underlying amount of margin or cash in the account to purchase the option. ie. If you want to buy a $3 option for BBBY (costing $300) then this will take $2800 from your initial cash or margin.<p>Yes, this effectively puts options out of reach to small investors, but... maybe that&#x27;s a good thing.
评论 #26133193 未加载
评论 #26138072 未加载
评论 #26139165 未加载
nbar超过 4 年前
What did Gill do that was illegal?
评论 #26132701 未加载
评论 #26130649 未加载
emteycz超过 4 年前
Why is the central offender - Depository Trust &amp; Clearing Corporation - not going to be there?
评论 #26130637 未加载
评论 #26130620 未加载
评论 #26132553 未加载
dehrmann超过 4 年前
I realize this is just grandstanding by congress, but it feels like there are more important things to be working on right now.
评论 #26130615 未加载
puranjay超过 4 年前
Really disappointed at HN&#x27;s recent stance on both crypto and GME. Far too many calls for regulation and control.<p>This is not the free market proponents platform I used to know.
评论 #26130883 未加载
评论 #26130771 未加载
评论 #26131750 未加载
评论 #26133753 未加载
yakaccount4超过 4 年前
that sucks
runawaybottle超过 4 年前
Buying calls on GME for the hearing, expecting a pump up for the fiasco.
jb775超过 4 年前
Have reminder set, will be making popcorn
KDJohnBrown超过 4 年前
Nice to know that the US legislature has deemed this a more important use of their time than the pandemic and the economy.
评论 #26130920 未加载
ajsharp超过 4 年前
Hey -- he likes the stock: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;wallstreetbets&#x2F;comments&#x2F;lj8djx&#x2F;day_1_of_gamestop_hearing_house_committee_on&#x2F;?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=web2x&amp;context=3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;wallstreetbets&#x2F;comments&#x2F;lj8djx&#x2F;day_...</a><p>Nothing else matters.