TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Inexpensive large scale (100's of TB) storage options?

5 点作者 websiteguy将近 14 年前
Typical solutions for backup, log files, email servers, databases all seem to cost $5K to $8K a TB over a 3 year period, including "support". Anyone with production experience with large scale disk storage that breaks the $1K/TB price point (raid'd)?

5 条评论

websiteguy将近 14 年前
@latch - Yes, we saw it - would be a fun project, but we are software hackers :-) There are also concerns about heat, vibration, hot swapping, etc. I would happily spend $78K for that same storage instead of $7.8K if it was reliable and was shipped as a complete package.<p>Closest company doing something like this is CORAID, which might be an option, but they have a number of proprietary interfaces/systems to buy in to.
评论 #2618969 未加载
websiteguy将近 14 年前
Thanks for the replies -<p>Need disk storage, would like to use 7200rpm for real-time access to logs, 15k for database/email apps<p>Would be a lot of fun to roll our own, but we are resource constrained, and while money is not an issue for us, I don't like complicated/expensive solutions, I like simple/inexpensive<p>Looking at NetApp for example, but having a hard time accepting the price point.
daniel-cussen将近 14 年前
Tape is the cheapest. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_tape_data_storage" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_tape_data_storage</a><p>Prices don't show here, but in general it's 15 times cheaper and 200 times less energy to use tape.
latch将近 14 年前
obligatory <i>have you read about the backblaze pod design?</i> comment:<p><a href="http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-h...</a>
rudiger将近 14 年前
Roll your own JBOD setup?