I'm a bit unsure what to think. From the article:<p>> "When you have the same kind of findings repeated ... and you keep coming up with the same finding, I think you can begin to say that the data is pretty clear"<p>But also:
> By 2019, more than 30 studies had examined prenatal exposure to different types of phthalates ... Not all of the papers had found consistent results, especially in the area of cognitive development, but the report's authors said that might be due to difference in study designs and children's ages.<p>While this finding certainly seems plausible, and the credentials of the project members are impeccable, I am a bit suspicious that they may simply be evaluating a large number of chemicals across a wide range of outcomes, and reporting on the noise.<p>Is there a theory on what the causal mechanism for these chemicals to cause these neurological conditions are?