TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

An Introduction to NAT64

40 点作者 telmich大约 4 年前

6 条评论

slindsey大约 4 年前
Such a pet peeve of mine. Define it, at least on the page. From wikipedia.<p>&gt; NAT64 is an IPv6 transition mechanism that facilitates communication between IPv6 and IPv4 hosts by using a form of network address translation (NAT). The NAT64 gateway is a translator between IPv4 and IPv6 protocols, for which function it needs at least one IPv4 address and an IPv6 network segment comprising a 32-bit address space.
评论 #26413649 未加载
评论 #26413414 未加载
moonbug大约 4 年前
Typically paired with 464xlat in an IPv6-only environment, for programs that are hard-coded for IPv4.<p>An excellent `just-works` example is <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;toreanderson&#x2F;clatd" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;toreanderson&#x2F;clatd</a>
andrewshadura大约 4 年前
Back in the day I wrote tnat64, a simple tsocks-like wrapper to redirect IPv4-only applications to a NAT64 gateway. It even worked with Skype to a degree: it&#x27;d log in and then repeatedly reconnect every minute or so.
评论 #26414096 未加载
sigio大约 4 年前
Another video on NAT64 by ungleich: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=IoYKNE4kSrA" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=IoYKNE4kSrA</a> on their implementation using p4
xmichael0大约 4 年前
I see no reason to use NAT64 over NAT. Am I wrong here?
评论 #26414716 未加载
评论 #26413666 未加载
评论 #26415598 未加载
评论 #26419289 未加载
kgersen大约 4 年前
sound is too low.
评论 #26426127 未加载