Surveillance Company Claims It Can Track Nearly Any Car in Real-Time

Yeah this company can fuck itself, eat a bag of dicks and hopefully die.<p>I don&#x27;t want to live in a world of surveillance such as this and anyone working for this company should down-right fuck off.<p>We already built a surveillance system that is too vast.<p>go fuck yourself:<p>Source: I helped build tracking tech for Lockheed, was the personal tech trainer for Tom Ridge when he joined the board of Lockheed and used to go to his house<p>I was also director at [company] when my team built all the Vizio, Samsung, LG spying tech into your Television... [Real-time screenshots from your TV, what you are watching and other data] ((kill your smart TV))<p>Yeah - it sickens me and this company can get fucked.<p>I am so tired of growing up in a world where I read science fiction in the 80s and thought &quot;wouldnt it be cool if&quot; and then helped make this dystopian nightmare of surveillance that we now live in.<p>Any engineer working on this crap should not be proud of the genie they just released from that bottle.<p>You know whats fucked up is that the biggest social media company has car tracking around its HQ and it reports lic plates back to the municipal city government...

Probably any modern car? OBD-3 was supposed to have a small GSM transceiver in it to relay GPS location, smog emission, speed, allow remote engine-shut-off, misc other things and that was starting to be deployed in 2012 on some cars but then put on hold for privacy issues. My old vehicle does not emit any RF and is OBD-2. Are there any car hackers on here that have hypothetically speaking modded the OBD-3 transceiver modules? <i>i.e. hypothetically spoofed speed, emissions, location.</i> I can&#x27;t even find a list of manufacturers that have implemented this. SEMA were the group leading the effort.

I assume they use phone data to do this.<p>If you were tricky you could work out which car a phone was in from the fingerprinting accelerometer data and other things.<p>But I suspect they are mostly exaggerating.

Article doesn&#x27;t mention license plate readers, which are quite common nowadays.<p>Also, in addition to plates, wouldn&#x27;t it be possible to monitor cellphone metadata in real time? Every phone is constantly checking into a base station, whether it is currently in use or not.<p>After a while it would be easy to build up a very useful database that not only kept track of cars but also kept track of the cellphones associated with those cars.<p>I can&#x27;t see how to prevent any of this from happening.<p>For all I know, Homeland Security already does all this. About the only thing keeping them from doing it is that some external contractor would probably charge them $billions to design and integrate this, and maybe they just haven&#x27;t spent the money yet.