Wow,<p>It's weird to have what seems (I repeat, <i>seems</i>) like pretty a big deal <i>technically</i> be first described in a meandering New Yorker article.<p>This is a more-or-less hand-tune system apparently effectively competing with deep learning systems (identifying cancer is far from easy and not solved by deep learning at this point). As the article says, by being person-created, the system has obvious advantage in both explainability and users being able to understand it's mistakes.<p>Of course, a broader look from experts is in order but I can't see this as a strong demonstration of an alternative paradigm. Now, the challenge is to automate the construction of systems of this sort.<p>And I can find little-to-no information about this, except in Japanese.