TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Arm says latest Huawei chip not subject to US export controls

46 点作者 dlcmh大约 4 年前

11 条评论

bserge大约 4 年前
Why even buy Huawei consumer devices now... even ignoring the CCP and their bs, Huawei now makes the same stuff as everyone else. Expensive, unrepairable, with locked down software and HiX bloatware. Maybe they do well in the Chinese market, I don&#x27;t know.<p>The Kirin 980 was pretty damn good (faster and cooler than Exynos and the SD845 of that year) but otherwise, you might as well get a Samsung or whatever.
评论 #26652279 未加载
评论 #26648559 未加载
评论 #26647988 未加载
pjc50大约 4 年前
Not immediately obvious why something designed in the UK and manufactured in Taiwan <i>should</i> be subject to US export controls, but that&#x27;s the world police for you.
评论 #26650048 未加载
评论 #26647647 未加载
评论 #26647655 未加载
评论 #26654162 未加载
Reason077大约 4 年前
What happens if Nvidia&#x27;s acquisition of ARM is approved?<p>Wouldn&#x27;t ARMv9 then become US technology, and subject to US export controls?
评论 #26647786 未加载
nirv大约 4 年前
I&#x27;m unable to find any source link besides Chinese websites.
评论 #26648921 未加载
评论 #26647384 未加载
TazeTSchnitzel大约 4 年前
How would it benefit them if they can&#x27;t manufacture chips?
throwaway4good大约 4 年前
As others have mentioned the challenge for Huawei&#x2F;HiSilicon is not the design but the chip fabrication. Probably HiSilicon has the capabilities of designing a chip from scratch based on RISC-V or another ISA that is cutting edge.<p>I have seen rumours that Huawei may use Samsung as fab? I don&#x27;t quite understand why Samsung would not be under the same constraints as TSMC. But perhaps the boycot of Huawei was more due to a deal between the Trump administration and the Taiwan government rather than an actual legal constraint. Much in the same manner as the US succesfully has lobbied for Huawei bans in most of the Western world.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sammobile.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;samsung-manufacture-huawei-5nm-kirin-9000l-processor&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sammobile.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;samsung-manufacture-huawei-5n...</a><p>Samsung could manufacture Huawei’s next 5nm Kirin processor<p>A new report coming out of China claims that Huawei’s next 5nm chipset, the Kirin 9000L, will be made by Samsung Foundry.
评论 #26649069 未加载
评论 #26648084 未加载
评论 #26648175 未加载
danielEM大约 4 年前
Looks like ARM has a new core that needs desperately to sell. So let Huawei buy the licenses and then put embargo on anyone that sells whatever to Huawei :)
blackrock大约 4 年前
Huawei should just dump ARM. And go all in with RISC-V.
评论 #26656495 未加载
nickdothutton大约 4 年前
If it was designed for Huawei using US EDA tools then it is subject to restriction. Even if it was Huawei specified, UK intellectual property and “sweat”. Unless of course Biden has changed the rules. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20210125200703&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.commerce.gov&#x2F;news&#x2F;press-releases&#x2F;2020&#x2F;05&#x2F;commerce-addresses-huaweis-efforts-undermine-entity-list-restricts" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20210125200703&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.comme...</a>
FpUser大约 4 年前
The US might do what it did before with ASML. Politely ask for the Dutch government not to approve sale.
secfirstmd大约 4 年前
Great place then for a backdoor.