I just happened to wonder yesterday whether there actually was any scientific data on whether the golden ratio is actually significantly more pleasing than other ratios.<p>Turns out there isn't much data, and of what there is, it doesn't always point at a significant preference for certain ratios. And even where it does, and then where it actually points near the golden ratio, it's inconclusive whether people prefer 1.5, 1.618 or 1.666.<p>But yeah they do turn up in nature over and over again.<p>The "aesthetically pleasing" bit is just something that's been repeated for centuries, swallowed without thinking.<p>So if there actually <i>were</i> a preference, that sounds like a good explanation. Doesn't really mean it works the other way around, though.<p>also see: <a href="http://plus.maths.org/content/os/issue22/features/golden/index" rel="nofollow">http://plus.maths.org/content/os/issue22/features/golden/ind...</a>