TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

When Feynman met Dirac (2020)

204 点作者 jorgenveisdal大约 4 年前

11 条评论

pseudolus大约 4 年前
Great article with a number of well-known references to biographies of Feynman. For those interested in Dirac, some excellent biographies have emerged over the years including: &quot;The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Mystic of the Atom&quot; and &quot;Dirac: A Scientific Biography &quot;. [0][1].<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;gp&#x2F;product&#x2F;B002LDM8QS&#x2F;ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_tkin_p1_i0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;gp&#x2F;product&#x2F;B002LDM8QS&#x2F;ref=dbs_a_def_r...</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Dirac-Scientific-Biography-Helge-Kragh&#x2F;dp&#x2F;0521380898&#x2F;ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=Dirac+a+scientific+biography&amp;qid=1617620520&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Dirac-Scientific-Biography-Helge-Krag...</a>
评论 #26706404 未加载
gerikson大约 4 年前
I really need to re-read Gleick&#x27;s &quot;Genius&quot;.
评论 #26703609 未加载
评论 #26697617 未加载
iamgopal大约 4 年前
When I read those papers, I feel, How much relaxed (less stressed) one must be to create this. Current dopamine inducing attention grabbing world makes it really difficult for such deep studies.
评论 #26699555 未加载
评论 #26700133 未加载
评论 #26700416 未加载
punnerud大约 4 年前
Look at Jørgen Veisdals other submissions on HN; 95% is articles he have written himself: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;submitted?id=jorgenveisdal" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;submitted?id=jorgenveisdal</a><p>I think this is impressive compared to most users in here.<p>Yes, this article is both written and submitted by Jørgen.
评论 #26705637 未加载
devgoldm大约 4 年前
It&#x27;s fascinating reading about giants of academia, that I&#x27;ve personally never thought to link together, interacting and disagreeing with one another in such a relatable way.<p>I wonder if anyone&#x27;s written about a younger Dirac and any interactions he got into with his heros, and so on and so forth back as far as possible? I&#x27;m sure there&#x27;s an amazing story to be told through following this &quot;thread of knowledge&quot; through time...
signa11大约 4 年前
are there similar books on lev landau ?
评论 #26698876 未加载
BrandoElFollito大约 4 年前
As an ex-physicist, these were the golden years of physics. Studying and then doing your PhD at that time must have been fascinating.<p>Today&#x27;s physics really bland. Either we look into some fantasy worlds we will never test (quantum foam &amp; co), or extremely niche ones.<p>My sons are fascinated by science and I am lightly driving them towards biology (biophysics, bioinformatics, ...) because I feel this is where the revolutionary changes happen and will happen.
评论 #26702348 未加载
评论 #26702072 未加载
rramadass大约 4 年前
The best compliment to the two geniuses (from the article);<p><i>and Wigner said, &quot;He is a second Dirac, only this time human.&quot;</i>
Jolter大约 4 年前
Anyone with a link that isn’t behind an auth-wall?
dzdt大约 4 年前
Site seems to be hugged to death. Backup link?
评论 #26699669 未加载
评论 #26699829 未加载
aborsy大约 4 年前
This comment is not very popular, especially in America, but Feynman was by and large a showman. His most celebrated publication is path integral approach. Dirac had a paper earlier (known as Dirac’s little paper), so did Norbert Wiener in a different context, on this approach. They didn’t pursue path integrals, as they could not (and still people can’t) make sense of them rigorously. Feynman looked up that paper and expanded on it.<p>He also drew useful diagrams, but you know ... :)
评论 #26697860 未加载
评论 #26698756 未加载
评论 #26698243 未加载
评论 #26701331 未加载
评论 #26698409 未加载
评论 #26697918 未加载
评论 #26697814 未加载
评论 #26697724 未加载
评论 #26699008 未加载
评论 #26702032 未加载
评论 #26698272 未加载
评论 #26697801 未加载
评论 #26697741 未加载