TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Justice Thomas argues for making Facebook, Twitter and Google utilities

13 点作者 kawera大约 4 年前

2 条评论

tomohawk大约 4 年前
What he actually said is here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;assets.documentcloud.org&#x2F;documents&#x2F;20579870&#x2F;order-list-04_05_2021.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;assets.documentcloud.org&#x2F;documents&#x2F;20579870&#x2F;order-li...</a><p>Short, and worth the read.
评论 #26719395 未加载
jl2718大约 4 年前
He’s bringing a lot of stuff together here. Firstly the obvious contradiction in the public forum &#x2F; private platform treatment of RDT, secondly the utility doctrine for natural monopolies, and thirdly the relationship between equal access law and antitrust.<p>I’d like to come out on the side against regulation, but, frankly, the regulation is already stacked against open platforms. As soon as anything illegal (and now increasingly only objectionable) is found on a tiny platform, it is easily shut down by threatening their payment processor, while the big platforms harbor illegal activity hundreds of times as large as elsewhere, and avoid liability by asserting best effort. Imagine if ‘Big Social’ disappeared forever the day after a broadcasting a live murder. Yes, this actually happened several times with absolutely no repercussions, while ‘other bbs’ was famously and immediately shut down after some guy wrote a post about what he did.<p>It seems to me that Jack sees the writing on the wall, and knows that this can’t last, but everybody in government will do everything they can to prevent decentralization. Regulation and protection as a utility may emerge as a preferable alternative to getting wiped out.
评论 #26725264 未加载