TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Software and Copyright: It’s Complicated

41 点作者 vmbrasseur大约 4 年前

4 条评论

hinkley大约 4 年前
Public domain software is particularly tricky situation for multi-nationals. Vetting an MIT licensed library is virtually a no-op, but some jurisdictions simply do not recognize PD licenses (let alone "do whatever the fuck you want" licenses people sometimes write while being clever). The one time I got stung by this it wasn't that hard to fix but things could have gone a lot different if we had more deeply leveraged either of the two PD tools that we had in our dependency chain. I swapped one for a slightly larger MIT licensed library, and set a coworker up to cleanroom the other, since I was already tainted.
评论 #26782803 未加载
评论 #26782828 未加载
aranchelk大约 4 年前
&gt; You could sue me for copyright infringement anyway, but you’d need to prove that my program copies yours. Some of the criteria used to prove this include the structure and organisation of the original source code, so even if I were to have used a different programming language, if I use the same code structure (even coincidentally) then it can appear as if I copied your program.<p>AFAIK, at least in the US, coincidence in and of itself is just fine, to prove infringement the copyright holder has to show that the defendant had access to the work, i.e. they actually copied it. This would seem to rule out most scenarios with a SASS&#x2F;closed source plaintiff.
评论 #26782378 未加载
runningmike大约 4 年前
misleading title: it’s not complicated, but you can make it complicated. Just use cc-by (sa or nd) and an osi approved foss license. A good read: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.hansenpartnership.com&#x2F;owning-your-own-copyrights-in-open-source&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.hansenpartnership.com&#x2F;owning-your-own-copyright...</a> or see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.codeforscience.org&#x2F;intellectual-property-in-open-projects&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.codeforscience.org&#x2F;intellectual-property-in-ope...</a> to keep it simple!
评论 #26783011 未加载
评论 #26788392 未加载
alexashka大约 4 年前
It&#x27;s complicated for lawyers. It&#x27;s not complicated for people who don&#x27;t have the money to hire and pay lawyers.<p>Who is the target audience for this book?
评论 #26785134 未加载