TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Instructions around the usage of meta robot tags and robots.txt files

106 点作者 volgo大约 4 年前

7 条评论

mimsee大约 4 年前
Why are they banning the methods instead of saying how the pricing should be displayed. E.g. why say you cannot have "noindex" instead of saying "the pricing information needs to be in plain-text, human-readable, accessible, indexable..." and so on.
评论 #26810728 未加载
评论 #26810817 未加载
评论 #26811087 未加载
评论 #26810666 未加载
评论 #26811585 未加载
rbinv大约 4 年前
Nice. They should probably add HTTP headers (X-Robots-Tag) to the list. Cloaking, too.
评论 #26810451 未加载
评论 #26811471 未加载
InfiniteRand大约 4 年前
As I read this, it seems like this is saying that if you are saying that you are posting public pricing information, you should not be hiding that information from search engines.<p>Seems like it&#x27;s trying to avoid people (I guess it&#x27;s targeted toward insurers, if I&#x27;m reading the main page correctly) saying that they are transparent about prices but hiding the information so no one sees it.<p>Please correct me if I&#x27;m wrong on this.
cosmotic大约 4 年前
They should retroactively penalize hospitals for trying to hide this information as it is clearly against the spirit of the law.
评论 #26813270 未加载
kjrose大约 4 年前
This will be a fun example of legalism v. Hacker ingenuity. Everytime they figure out a specific legal way to write up a trick to hide prices, the folks will find another loophole to hide them.<p>Honestly. This could be a fun race to the bottom.
ninetax大约 4 年前
Typo in headline?
评论 #26810996 未加载
评论 #26813498 未加载
评论 #26810910 未加载
MattGaiser大约 4 年前
At least they are keeping up with current technical tricks.