TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ethereum Fork Fails on OpenEthereum

112 点作者 vecio大约 4 年前

10 条评论

elwell大约 4 年前
Fix merged: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;openethereum&#x2F;openethereum&#x2F;pull&#x2F;366#event-4600217874" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;openethereum&#x2F;openethereum&#x2F;pull&#x2F;366#event-...</a>
评论 #26824242 未加载
评论 #26824047 未加载
rfd4sgmk8u大约 4 年前
Satoshi wrote in 2010: &quot;I don&#x27;t believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea. So much of the design depends on all nodes getting exactly identical results in lockstep that a second implementation would be a menace to the network. The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses, so there is no need to rewrite it from a licensing standpoint.&quot; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bitcointalk.org&#x2F;index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bitcointalk.org&#x2F;index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611</a><p>In ETH land, the wise guidance of Satoshi is regularly ignored.
评论 #26822326 未加载
评论 #26821928 未加载
评论 #26821943 未加载
评论 #26822512 未加载
评论 #26824365 未加载
评论 #26822055 未加载
评论 #26822539 未加载
评论 #26821944 未加载
评论 #26823202 未加载
评论 #26822487 未加载
评论 #26821970 未加载
评论 #26822090 未加载
评论 #26821910 未加载
axiosgunnar大约 4 年前
Can somebody explain the significance?<p>Is this related to the conflict between devs and miners where devs want to reduce the mining fees and miners responded by creating a fork?
评论 #26820950 未加载
评论 #26820664 未加载
评论 #26820674 未加载
评论 #26823366 未加载
评论 #26824322 未加载
评论 #26820673 未加载
vecio大约 4 年前
Fix <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;openethereum&#x2F;openethereum&#x2F;pull&#x2F;366" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;openethereum&#x2F;openethereum&#x2F;pull&#x2F;366</a>
arberx大约 4 年前
Back up and running: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forkmon.ethdevops.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forkmon.ethdevops.io&#x2F;</a><p>Might take a bit to sync
评论 #26821056 未加载
fogof大约 4 年前
It seems the issue was in how OpenEthereum handled access lists introduced by EIP2929&#x2F;2930. They were adding built-in contract addresses to access lists in blocks before those addresses were activated.
m00dy大约 4 年前
The problematic block <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hash.horse&#x2F;0xac324366422b3ef181a3f62efd81eee6a3a887cf1ef7ce520d8a5ddc1a210f8e" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hash.horse&#x2F;0xac324366422b3ef181a3f62efd81eee6a3a887c...</a>
评论 #26823501 未加载
CryptoLich大约 4 年前
Fireblocks (massive institutional settlement platform for crypto-to-crypto and crypto-to-fiat transactions (like bank-size transactions) is on openethereum too -- all the settlements are completely backed up right now and tether is going really bid
seibelj大约 4 年前
My former employer (major exchange) switched from Parity &#x2F; Openethereum after the last major issue. The Parity devs gave it up when they switched to focusing on Polkadot and the community is not super committed to it. Geth is the safer choice.
throw4738大约 4 年前
Ethereum is THE fork. Original is called Ethereum Classic.
评论 #26823697 未加载
评论 #26827017 未加载
评论 #26823451 未加载