The first thing that comes to mind is uTest (<a href="http://www.utest.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.utest.com/</a>). It does the similar type of crowdsourcing, but the quality of the testers we experienced were pretty horrible (with a few exceptions).<p>The guaranteed video of the testing process is an interesting idea - it's a lot slower to review video testing on the developer's side, but having video really would have helped clear up some of the issues that were reported to us.<p>The main problems we had with uTest were 1) the inconsistent tester quality and 2) the horrible test cycle management interface. It seems you could easily beat #1, and #2 is just some coding away.