http://Sprint.Im is a simple way of managing tasks and projects collaboratively. This is my first Saas product.<p>BackStory: When working on projects, there was really no way to track what was completed during the present week and what tasks were pending. Sprint.Im is sort of like an introspection on what work was really done. It's called Sprint.Im as it is loosely based on the agile project management process - Scrum. Each week here is a sprint and pending tasks are moved over to the new sprint.<p>I'm planning to add metrics to the tool so each team member can measure his productively and compare to his previous sprints.<p>I would really appreciate any feedback and/or suggestions.
I think it looks great, just a few thoughts (mostly on UX/UI):
1. You probably can do without the <hr> tag separating the head and the rest of the body on the landing page
2. I see a signup button, but not a login/signin for existing user
3. I find the font a bit quirky, but that's just my preference. I try to do non-cursive font for easier reading
4. The about page: a) url is sprint.im/user/about--that's a bit weird as I'd assume it's just sprint.im/about b) shorter paragraphs and make the long paragraphs about "why Sprint.im different" into a list
5. Quick tour page: the bounding box of each step needs some top/bottom padding/margin. They're connected to each other right now.
6. Register page: a) help text for password is "secret salt" I get it, but I think the word salt would be confusing b) I don't like the arrow icon to the left--it's too big and too gaudy as a list icon
7. Just another thought/question for discussion as I am also wondering about this myself. It's a B2B/Saas, I wonder if the fact that it was made by one person should be pin-pointed (on the about page). Most people would prefer that their software is made by a team/group/company. Having a single name as designer/developer takes away that illusion of "faith" and can turn a lot of people away.<p>I think it's a great project. Congratulations on launching your beta. It's a great step and you should be happy and proud of it. Now just iterate like a machine and I'm sure you'll definitely see some interesting movement. Your space is interesting in that: there's a lot of players, but there isn't a king or someone who basically rule the rest (well, basecamp/jira maybe?), but that means if you focus (which I see that you are) you'll capture some market share that other guys haven't or can't seem to do. Good luck and as always, please update us on each iteration.<p>-V.
Just a note on your headline, "Sprint.Im is the simplest way to create tasks and manage projects"<p>I look at a lot of these project or task management tools. I'm fascinated by them and actually maintain a large running list. Too many try to use the approach of "simple" or "easy" project management. (See <a href="http://www.teamworkpm.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.teamworkpm.net/</a> and <a href="http://www.easyprojects.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.easyprojects.net/</a> and <a href="http://projectbubble.com/" rel="nofollow">http://projectbubble.com/</a> [title tag] and <a href="http://tasskr.com/" rel="nofollow">http://tasskr.com/</a> - the list goes on.) While simple and easy may be one facet companies or individuals are looking for, I think it's overused and the wrong approach. Realistically, claiming you are the best at anything is fairly haughty, but people are good at attributing it to marketing text.<p>You would probably be better off attacking it from another angle. "Effective project management for small teams." (Is it meant for teams or individuals? I presume teams, but it's not very clear.) That being said, the best approach is to run tests to find the most effective headline.
If you are aiming this towards software development projects, you'll really need to integrate with popular bug tracking software etc. If you want to be hip, integrate with github.