There's nothing wrong with what Neo4J is doing here and they aren't fighting the GPL/AGPL. ONgDB forked it, with was fine, but they just couldn't resist trying to give the finger to Neo4J when they did it. In doing that they used Neo4J trademarks and made false or misleading statements and shouldn't be surprised that Neo4J would take issue with that. They're <i>required</i> to enforce their trademarks.<p>They should have just forked it, changed the names which it looks like that's what they're doing going forward.