Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

Hmm<p><pre><code> * mentions HBGary a lot * focuses on people who have been previously associated with the HBGary hack * shows special disdain for kayla and sabu &#38; seems to be personally offended * likes to link people to their social networking profiles * only non-skiddie name mentioned is Barr's * obviously works (worked?) in infosec * previously in the military? (ALPHA MIKE FOXTROT = Adios Mother Fuckers) </code></pre> Gee, I wonder who the author might be...

For lack of a better explanation, is it crazy to consider the possibility lulzsec released this themselves? Hack innocents, preferably script kiddies from 4chan, install evidence on their systems, and walk away through the smoke.

yeah lets put random peoples names in a pastebin and claim they are 3 different groups all rolled into one. I just write articles, and sometimes people get upset by them. its probably Barr because i wrote those crowdleaks articles about him ,he also had his pet lawyer threaten me.

Reading the Laurelai/NA cap about the FBI raid made me wonder if anyone ever tries to reverse-bug the FBI by hiding bugs in HDDs and other equipment prone to seizure...

There are some odd problems with this document:<p>1) The timeline in the beginning is incorrect. #11 shows Laurelai was part of the HBGary attack. Yet in the #hq logs, Sabu had no idea who Laurelai was (and raged on him/her pretty hard). 2) Kayla is the only member that the A Team does not dox. However, the Laurelai/NA conversation contains a reference to the Xyrix = Kayla idea (which is referenced in many other places). Xyrix' denials are weak.

Has anyone checked out those PGP files? Don't really feel like doing it myself, considering the likely unsavory nature of the author of this document (barr...).

I am currently imagining the icy thrill running down their spines if these guys fingered them properly...

I don't see how anyone can actually trust this leak though. How can we verify if this information is legitimate?

&#62; 20:25 &#60;Laurelai&#62; want me to be an informant on account im everywhere and iwas in the army<p>No honour amongst thieves eh.

I find it amusing that they call Lulzsec out for being childish, then think it's relevant to post the personal information of some dude's sister (and cry "LESBOZ!!!" because she's married to another girl).<p>Reddit has rules against posting personal information. Does this website not? I really have little interest in websites that think it's ok to spread people's personal data. Weren't we mad at Sony and Lulzsec for allowing that sort of thing to happen?

That was a horrible yet interesting read at the same time. The PGP keys deceived me into thinking there was more content then there really was.<p>What does the author mean by bounce in the document, take over a machine and proxy themselves with it? I'm confused.

I don't know if any of the identities are real. The Sabu guy's alleged name has been out for a while now, and after some googling it all goes back to some weird site: backtracesecurity.com<p>Until we get some arrests I wouldn't be particularly excited over this.

So how do they identify people who have no facebook account or facebook friends? That seemed to be the main focus of identifying people.

What is a busy box?

How is this (if we presume it's true) possible without deep infiltration? If that's the case, wouldn't the guy that exposed them be a perpetrator too?

They seem to be pretty good at computers, I don't see why they can't learn how to spell.

Drama

you're, not your.<p>edit: desides? How old is the author, I wonder? It all sounds very 'schoolyard'.

What is more ironic?<p>1. The gross miss spelling in the post 2. That Mr Barr could not catch somewhat beginner hackers

What Interests me is, who capped all the logs. In a room with four ops and 4 non ops, unless it was server admin?

Didn't the kid have a spell checker or did he just want to sound l33t?<p>Usually I'm not a grammar nazi (english isn't my first language so I understand the curse of engrish) but this is just annoying to read.

These guys sound pretty butthurt

Boring.<p>The problem with these tards is that they lack the discretion to find interesting problems to tackle. So: they pick on weaklings like Sony.<p>Real grown-ups find good problems to solve and, well, solve them. A lot of those guys profit from them.<p>I hope that the lolsec guys eventually realize that there's more to gain from helping the world than from hurting it.

Their last tweet is 5 hours back ... wonder if there will be anymore lulz there ...

I don't know about the validity of this, but that skull and cross bones was pretty fun.

I did actually ask Lulzsec to hack my site. They never got back.

I read the whole thing, for some lulz search laurelai then incremental search fbi lol

I personally applaud the unmasking of the internet's anonymous. Maybe once they realize they're not truly anonymous, they'll stop with their appalling behavior. What they're doing exemplifies everything that is wrong with our sensationalist, power-hungry and generally corrupted culture.<p>This kind of mob-trolling behavior is not ok, and prosecuting perpetrators to the full extend of the law ought to set a nice example.<p>I'm all for free speech, and blowing the whistle. But this is much too far, and honestly, anarchy isn't any better than a police state.