TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Florida Deplatforming Law Is Unconstitutional

21 点作者 glitcher大约 4 年前

6 条评论

throwaway292893大约 4 年前
I guess we will see, but I welcome the change. I&#x27;m glad someone is doing something to reel these social media giants in.<p>I&#x27;d like to see transparent moderation logs first and foremost.<p>These billion dollar companies are not immune to regulation just because they exist on the internet.<p>It&#x27;s funny when you hear the &quot;it&#x27;s a private company they don&#x27;t have to respect your 1A&quot; then the same crowd comes by and says, &quot;you can&#x27;t force them to respect people&#x27;s 1A, that violates the companies 1A!&quot;<p>When did we start caring about corporation rights more than people&#x27;s rights?
评论 #27065572 未加载
genericuser314大约 4 年前
&gt; 470 The term does not include any information service, system,<p>&gt; 471 Internet search engine, or access software provider operated by<p>&gt; 472 a company that owns and operates a theme park or entertainment<p>&gt; 473 complex as defined in s. 509.013.<p>The bill includes an exception for companies that own theme parks, which I for one am entirely in favor of.<p>Move Fast And Break Things - The Rollercoaster<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flsenate.gov&#x2F;Session&#x2F;Bill&#x2F;2021&#x2F;7072&#x2F;BillText&#x2F;er&#x2F;HTML" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flsenate.gov&#x2F;Session&#x2F;Bill&#x2F;2021&#x2F;7072&#x2F;BillText&#x2F;er&#x2F;...</a>
评论 #27065218 未加载
5560675260大约 4 年前
I appreciate that EFF is concerned about corporate speech control, but this is completely inadequate:<p>&gt; if a candidate for office is suspended or banned from social media during an election, the public needs to know why, and and the candidate needs a process to appeal the decision<p>In a case like this company should be investigated (same way as a foreign agent meddling in elections), potentially fined and denied a licence to operate as a social media.
评论 #27065397 未加载
评论 #27065335 未加载
WarOnPrivacy大约 4 年前
A government mandate that private entities must amplify the agenda of the party in power is a tyranny that the 1A was crafted to prevent.
评论 #27065648 未加载
mech422大约 4 年前
I&#x27;m actually curious what makes anyone think Florida has any jurisdiction? Are any social media companies based in florida, have offices in Florida or &#x27;do business&#x27; in Florida? I thought at least one of those had to be true to be bound by the laws of state?<p>Can Florida create laws that are enforcable over entities with no ties to Florida ?<p>Also, I like the &#x27;move fast and break things&#x27; roller coaster idea!
评论 #27068725 未加载
评论 #27068451 未加载
coward76大约 4 年前
States are free to enact laws and companies are free not to do business in those states. States might prevent realtors from discrimination when showing homes, it is within their role as government.<p>Big tech could exclude Florida if they choose.
评论 #27065448 未加载