TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

High Hopes claims stratospheric breakthrough in direct air CO2 capture

10 点作者 bornelsewhere大约 4 年前

4 条评论

pmastela大约 4 年前
&gt;The trouble right now is the extremely high cost of pulling carbon directly out of the air. Switzerland&#x27;s Climeworks operates at 14 locations presently, with large factories processing ambient air and separating out the carbon, but its costs are currently somewhere in the range of US$600-1000 per ton, and its own future projections graph doesn&#x27;t show this price dropping much below US$250&#x2F;ton by 2035.<p>Just because we can, doesn&#x27;t mean we should. In this case, just because we can build a technologically advanced solution to capture carbon doesn&#x27;t mean we actually should be investing so many resources in that when we already have something that does the job incredibly well: Trees. They do one heck of a job capturing carbon and cost nothing.
评论 #27068260 未加载
评论 #27068773 未加载
评论 #27068981 未加载
monkeydreams大约 4 年前
This appears to be inspired by an idea published years ago which suggested building industrial refridgeration in Antarctica to achieve the same goals.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;judithcurry.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;08&#x2F;24&#x2F;a-modest-proposal-for-sequestration-of-co2-in-the-antarctic&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;judithcurry.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;08&#x2F;24&#x2F;a-modest-proposal-for-seq...</a>
nashashmi大约 4 年前
Carbon capture by tree method is better. But it does not work well enough in urban areas.<p>As co2 is heavy, it settles to the ground quickly in cool areas. Like jungles and forests with lots of shade. High co2 density in such areas contributes to tree growth. That’s probably the better location for co2 capture.
JoeAltmaier大约 4 年前
Do it in Tibet, and you get 5000ft (out of 35000) for free!