TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chevy Volt: Is This Our Future?

59 点作者 cubix将近 14 年前

12 条评论

Lewisham将近 14 年前
I'm actually most concerned about the lifetime of the batteries. From what I've read, the batteries top out at 8 years, and presumably degrade before that. As the $20k Chevy Cruze is the same chassis as the Volt, I guess the batteries come out at ~$15k. That's a huge amount of money to renew use of your $40k car after 8 years (unless you see that $15k as some sort of investment in the environment).<p>The Volt design could/should succeed. But not with battery tech where it is. Those batteries need to do 10--12 years.
评论 #2708825 未加载
评论 #2708442 未加载
评论 #2708499 未加载
评论 #2708630 未加载
评论 #2709221 未加载
评论 #2708620 未加载
bbg将近 14 年前
I want to love electric cars, but I see two big issues: (1) if they go mass market, all that electricity will still have to be generated somewhere. Coal? Nuclear? (2) The batteries need rare-earth minerals, which are brought to market through environmentally-degrading open pit mining. Furthermore, at this point, most rare-earths are available almost exclusively from China.
评论 #2708634 未加载
评论 #2708538 未加载
评论 #2708580 未加载
评论 #2708646 未加载
评论 #2708963 未加载
评论 #2708628 未加载
nhebb将近 14 年前
The $7500 tax credit is getting gamed by some dealers who resell the car to other dealers and take the credit for themselves. I don't know how widespread this is, but it's the kind of thing that makes my blood boil: <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43243050/ns/business-autos/t/some-volt-dealers-take-tax-credit-themselves/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43243050/ns/business-autos/t/som...</a>
评论 #2709044 未加载
评论 #2708652 未加载
Derbasti将近 14 年前
Can someone explain to me, why, exactly, this should be better than a hybrid design?<p>A hybrid design can use a comparatively tiny combustion engine together with an electric motor, which saves fuel consumption and does not need to be plugged in ever.<p>The Volt needs both a full-fledged combustion engine and a full-fledged electric engine <i>and</i> needs to be plugged in after each drive. That sounds basically like combining the disadvantages of electric motors and combustion engines in one car. Why would anyone want that? (And electricity is not exactly free, either)
评论 #2710481 未加载
评论 #2709757 未加载
评论 #2709257 未加载
chrismealy将近 14 年前
Even better:<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omafiets" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omafiets</a>
jarin将近 14 年前
In the future, everything is gamified.<p>Actually, you know who really needs to gamify things? Banks.
评论 #2708453 未加载
评论 #2708403 未加载
评论 #2708853 未加载
dstein将近 14 年前
I've always thought the Volt sounded way over-engineered. Why bother with a fancy hybrid engine rather than concentrating on making a lightweight, affordable all-electric car? The simple approach is always going to win. Zenncars.com was taking this approach but I'm not sure of their progress.
评论 #2708607 未加载
评论 #2708700 未加载
rokhayakebe将近 14 年前
The US should invest in high speed rails, better inner city transportation systems, and encouraging people to use bicycles . Electric cars aren't the solution.
tectonic将近 14 年前
What's the environmental impact of making the batteries?
评论 #2708944 未加载
daimyoyo将近 14 年前
I've said before and I'll say again: Electric cars will not gain widespread acceptance until you can travel the equivalent of a tank of gas on one charge. Tesla motors is close, but you need at least 300 and closer to 400 miles per charge.
评论 #2708612 未加载
评论 #2708488 未加载
评论 #2708685 未加载
评论 #2709001 未加载
评论 #2709216 未加载
评论 #2708598 未加载
评论 #2708730 未加载
meemo将近 14 年前
I'd like to see the reviewers electricity bill.
spiritomb将近 14 年前
Coal-Burning cars (er.. electric) are the future!
评论 #2708419 未加载
评论 #2708483 未加载