TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

AWS drops bandwidth pricing

271 点作者 werner将近 14 年前

21 条评论

rkalla将近 14 年前
Making <i>all</i> in-bound traffic free is a super-aggressive (and much appreciated) move.<p>As blhack pointed out Voxel's per-GB rate[1] before AWS dropped was extremely competitive, but they charge for in and out-bound data. AWS, after the 1st of July will only charge $0.12 for out-bound data and $0.00 for inbound data, effectively making it something like $0.06/GB compared to Voxel (I'm hand-waving this a bit to make a point).<p>Also as wiradikusuma pointed out, this comes right on the heals of Google's App Engine pricing structure change[2] to be more business-friendly (read: more expensive/more predictable billing) that upset smaller shops and individuals.<p>As someone who reads most of the AWS forums every night, I would say overall that Amazon seems to be responding more quickly to low level failures that used to run rampant on the system (although US-EAST still has more failures than any other region. I guess due to overload). They seem like they are hitting faster/smoother, sounds like a good time to push forward and grow which I imagine this move will help do.<p>Getting a little excited to see what the price decrease for per-GB billing on S3 will be in the coming months following this up (my assumption).<p>[1] <a href="http://www.voxel.net/pricing" rel="nofollow">http://www.voxel.net/pricing</a><p>[2] <a href="http://www.korokithakis.net/posts/app-engine-pricing-changes-revisited/" rel="nofollow">http://www.korokithakis.net/posts/app-engine-pricing-changes...</a>
评论 #2713057 未加载
评论 #2713230 未加载
timf将近 14 年前
The pricing change is better understood with the tables here which include a "previous" column:<p><a href="http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2011/06/aws-lowers-its-pricing-again-free-inbound-data-transfer-and-lower-outbound-data-transfer-for-all-ser.html" rel="nofollow">http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2011/06/aws-lowers-its-pricing-ag...</a>
sriramk将近 14 年前
This is probably a move in response to Windows Azure dropping its inbound data transfer rates to zero last week. When I was back in Windows Azure, we would often see AWS try to do a price-match whenever we changed prices drastically.
评论 #2713984 未加载
zmmmmm将近 14 年前
I'm blown away. This radically changes the cost for one of my core products (automated browsing from EC2 machines). I've thought for a long time that EC2 was getting comparatively very expensive for bandwidth (simply not decreasing their prices). I thought they would have to change it, but I didn't expect free!
评论 #2712800 未加载
werner将近 14 年前
My blogpost w background information: <a href="http://wv.ly/iLDaqu" rel="nofollow">http://wv.ly/iLDaqu</a>
评论 #2712910 未加载
nigelsampson将近 14 年前
I wonder if this was in reaction to the same pricing change from MS Azure <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazure/archive/2011/06/22/announcing-free-ingress-for-all-windows-azure-customers-starting-july-1st-2011.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazure/archive/2011/06/22/anno...</a>
Rickasaurus将近 14 年前
Amazon is now the #1 choice for web scrapers everywhere :)
评论 #2712488 未加载
评论 #2712637 未加载
blhack将近 14 年前
For another comparison, voxel.net (which serves imgur):<p><a href="http://www.voxel.net/pricing" rel="nofollow">http://www.voxel.net/pricing</a><p>$0.10/GB up to 40TB<p>$0.07/GB up to 500TB<p>$0.05/GB &#62;500TB<p>This looks like the cheapest "real" CDN I've seen. Awesome :) Not that I need it [yet], but here's to hoping :)
评论 #2714037 未加载
评论 #2713090 未加载
orijing将近 14 年前
Dropbox must be super happy that half their bandwidth costs have disappeared!
评论 #2712962 未加载
评论 #2714541 未加载
评论 #2713444 未加载
chaselee将近 14 年前
Now if only Google App Engine would follow suit...oh wait they raised prices =/
tzs将近 14 年前
This is big. It makes it a lot cheaper for a busy site to keep an up to date mirror at Amazon on standby for use in emergencies.
wiradikusuma将近 14 年前
this should put some pressure on recent Google App Engine price increase (fingers crossed)
MrAlmostWrong将近 14 年前
Everytime I see a price drop my first though is always, "I wonder how much this increases Dropbox's revenue?"
latch将近 14 年前
I don't even remember what the old pricing was. For the first (non-free tier), was it at 0.18? 0.12/gb is getting pretty cheap for non-bulk bandwidth of this quality.<p>edit<p>above poster has link showing it was 0.15
MaxGabriel将近 14 年前
For someone inexperienced in this market, why wouldn't they just say free? I've never heard someone sell something for "$0.00"
评论 #2712438 未加载
kmfrk将近 14 年前
The timing for this Django deployment script couldn't have been better: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2700120" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2700120</a>.<p>I was going to look into deployment scripts for App Engine, but Amazon makes it more compelling to use AWS.
neworbit将近 14 年前
Good lord, about time. Why was incoming bandwidth ever on the list?
评论 #2712460 未加载
aolnerd将近 14 年前
We're looking for even cheaper bandwidth for streaming audio. Can anyone recommend a vendor to provide 150mbit+ bandwidth on a vps platform or rented server platform?
Joakal将近 14 年前
Why is bandwidth pricing higher in Asia despite bandwidth rates there being among the highest in the world?
评论 #2712562 未加载
评论 #2712523 未加载
nhoss2将近 14 年前
ooh "AWS drops bandwidth pricing" come on please be true! darn it just inbound.
评论 #2712433 未加载
评论 #2712443 未加载
anamax将近 14 年前
I wonder how soon/if tarsnap will update their pricing.
评论 #2715884 未加载