TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Bitcoin Uses Far Less Energy Than Banking System and Gold Industry

16 点作者 disgrunt将近 4 年前

3 条评论

vanusa将近 4 年前
Even if we accept their estimates -- and of course, given that this coming from a mining company, we wouldn&#x27;t have the slightest reason not to! --<p>It is straight up dishonest to attempt to draw a comparison based solely on total <i>network</i> footprint. As the authors of the &quot;whitepaper&quot; are fully aware, what everyone is concerned with is the alarmingly high BTC footprint per <i>transaction</i>. In addition to who exactly benefits from all this insane footprint generation, at the end of the day.
评论 #27190253 未加载
评论 #27215466 未加载
olliej将近 4 年前
But how many billions of transactions are these networks handling? BTC is using vastly more power per transaction. What would be the power usage of BTC if it were scaled up to support an actual useful number of transactions?
评论 #27187734 未加载
评论 #27187701 未加载
itsdsmurrell将近 4 年前
<i>cough</i> Bitcoin Cash <i>cough</i><p>Increasing the blocksize was always Satoshi&#x27;s plan:<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bitcointalk.org&#x2F;index.php?topic=1347.msg15366#msg15366" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bitcointalk.org&#x2F;index.php?topic=1347.msg15366#msg153...</a><p>This means that when the coinbase rewards run out, the fees pay for the mining. Small fees, keeping the network useful, for billions of transactions (bandwidth and storage costs decrease according to Moore&#x27;s law). With this final state, individual on-chain transactions would not take much energy at all.