TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Decentralised Currencies Are Probably Impossible

4 点作者 joewalnes将近 14 年前

2 条评论

mrb将近 14 年前
The author, Ben Laurie, argues that the way <i>checkpoints</i> are arbitrarily applied to the Bitcoin block chain relies on trust (of the developers), and therefore make Bitcoin centralized. He then argues that an efficient currency could be designed based on this trust.<p>Firstly, only 7 blocks are checkpointed out of the 134000 in existence (as of July 2, 2011):<p><pre><code> if ((nHeight == 11111 &#38;&#38; hash != uint256("0x0000000069e244f73d78e8fd29ba2fd2ed618bd6fa2ee92559f542fdb26e7c1d")) || (nHeight == 33333 &#38;&#38; hash != uint256("0x000000002dd5588a74784eaa7ab0507a18ad16a236e7b1ce69f00d7ddfb5d0a6")) || (nHeight == 68555 &#38;&#38; hash != uint256("0x00000000001e1b4903550a0b96e9a9405c8a95f387162e4944e8d9fbe501cd6a")) || (nHeight == 70567 &#38;&#38; hash != uint256("0x00000000006a49b14bcf27462068f1264c961f11fa2e0eddd2be0791e1d4124a")) || (nHeight == 74000 &#38;&#38; hash != uint256("0x0000000000573993a3c9e41ce34471c079dcf5f52a0e824a81e7f953b8661a20")) || (nHeight == 105000 &#38;&#38; hash != uint256("0x00000000000291ce28027faea320c8d2b054b2e0fe44a773f3eefb151d6bdc97")) || (nHeight == 118000 &#38;&#38; hash != uint256("0x000000000000774a7f8a7a12dc906ddb9e17e75d684f15e00f8767f9e8f36553"))) return error("AcceptBlock() : rejected by checkpoint lockin at %d", nHeight); </code></pre> The mechanism by which these checkpoints are added is very slow: every few months developers add them, and it takes months for most of the users to deploy these new versions of the software (notwithstanding the fact that many users never upgrade). Obviously a delay of multiple months to validate transactions and issue coins is not acceptable. I cannot imagine how an efficient currency could be built on top of this "more efficient" mechanism as described by Laurie, who avoids this problem by stating "the exact mechanism by which these snapshots are established is not important".<p>Secondly, he argues they make Bitcoin dependent on the trust of the developers. This is not the case. The developers simply record some proof-of-works recognized by the global Bitcoin network as of thousands of blocks ago. Trust in these checkpoints is 100% based on trust of the proof-of-work mechanism. The purpose of these checkpoints is to help prevent attacks where Bitcoin nodes are isolated from the global peer-to-peer network via active man-in-the-middle attacks, and are distributed an illegitimate block chain. This only solves part of the problem (only the blocks up to 118000 are checkpointed) but it is better than nothing.
joeyh将近 14 年前
Is the checkpointing mechanism he implies actually present in bitcoin? Not clear to me if it's a rhetorical device or if the bitcoin developers are actually updating a last-good-checksum variable in the source from time to time.