TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Deep comparison Google+ vs Facebook

17 点作者 urlwolf将近 14 年前

4 条评论

Shenglong将近 14 年前
<i>Facebook, on the other hand, does not make an effort to warn people the they’ve been tagged (possibly in an unflattering or compromising photo) and give them an immediate chance to remove the tag.</i><p>What? It definitely does. I get an email every time someone adds a picture of me. I also think a lot of us make an effort not to delete unflattering photos. Not every picture posted is nice, but it adds new dimensions to your online personality. If you don't like people adding your pictures, you can always change your privacy settings.<p>Most of these reasons other than data liberation are very one-sided. Facial recognition can be seen as a bad thing, but some would argue it's a nice feature. Although, honestly, what information on my Facebook would I want to liberate anyway? My years-old wall posts of "Omg I miss you" and "lol up!!!" that I never even look at?
评论 #2727030 未加载
评论 #2727159 未加载
评论 #2727110 未加载
teilo将近 14 年前
This article would be more believable if they removed the word "deep" from the title. A deep analysis would show that other than the Google platform integration, these so-called differentiators fall apart.<p>Hangouts is unique -- for now. I'm pretty sure Facebook is already working on something similar.<p>The only real differentiation I have seen is the UI. The Facebook UI is getting very hairy. It is hard to find things. You shouldn't have to Google (oh, the irony) to find out "how do I do X on Facebook?".<p>So Facebook's real vulnerability, as I see it, is platform creep. It's due for a major re-write, but of course they then risk alienating their user base at the worse possible time. Google's move is therefore quite strategic.
评论 #2727572 未加载
rufibarbatus将近 14 年前
s/deep/overtly biased/<p>I'm not really a big fan of Facebook; it's gotten to a point where I resent it for how locked into it I am right now [1]. I'm very much rooting for someone to come up with a product good enough to reduce the Facebook effect.<p>That said, this article is shallow, disputable and occasionally wrong. And it reaks of link bait. If you haven't clicked the link yet, don't waste your attention.<p>[1]: <a href="http://www.gq.com/news-politics/big-issues/201012/viral-me-silicon-valley-social-networking-devin-friedman?printable=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.gq.com/news-politics/big-issues/201012/viral-me-s...</a> Ctrl+F friction
seagaia将近 14 年前
"For the most part, Google has lived up to its “Don’t Be Evil” slogan. Which company would you rather have as the steward of your personally identifiable information?"<p>Well, I'm not sure. I don't think either of them would do anything EVIL (sell my personal information to some person to come threaten my family), but don't both of them use all of our info to sell to advertising companies (which in a way, is practical, and kind of evil?)
评论 #2727105 未加载
评论 #2728040 未加载